Sun and shadows, 12:33 pm on August 22

Saw these long shadows while walking to Starbucks for a refill after teaching my morning class today. I really liked the LONG diagonal lines and the bright white light lining the top of the utility pipes inside the cage, so I stopped and took a photo.

Here’s the bigger picture, for context.

If you follow my blog, you’ll probably recognize that we’ve been here before. I walk this way to Starbucks just about every weekday, so it’s only natural it would be a spot that takes up some space on my phone’s camera roll. And as you can see, this little corner of the world changes its looks pretty substantially depending on the time of day, whether or not it’s sunny, the seasonal angle of the sun, etc.

For example, here’s a picture I took last year with morning sunlight casting cool reflections down from the building’s windows.

 

And here’s a photo taken later in the morning, still early enough to have the window-pane patterns across the lawn but also late enough to see some diagonal shadows cast along the white walls of the building from those pipes jutting out. Plus there are some interesting additional shadows cast by the chain-link of the utility cage.

 

Below is shot of the area with afternoon sun, too late to cast diagonal shadows from the pipes (which are barely distinguishable from the rest of the wall here) but not too late to cut a bright swath of light across the lawn between the shadows of building and trees.

 

And finally, here’s a boring “as is” photo on an overcast day, with no light/shadow drama whatsoever. Except that, unlike in the photo above, where you could barely make out the four pipes, the cloud-dispersed “soft” light wraps the tiniest bit of shadowing around the base of each pipe to give it some shape.

So that’s today’s post. As one might say in a Facebook status, I’m “feeling grateful” for a beautiful Wisconsin summer day. Sunny and slightly breezy, with temperatures right around 70 dgrees. Perfect.

 

Posted in Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

“The Shape of Water” is concentric circles

Raindrops on water is one of the loveliest sights I know. Always makes me happy and is something I seek out at the end of a storm, just as I also automatically look for rainbows.

Is that something I do because I’m a mom and always did it with my kids? Or did I always do it with my kids because that’s who I am anyway. Because my own parents did it with me perhaps?

Hard to tell where these circles begin and end. A raindrop can’t generate waves if the water isn’t there waiting for it in the first place. And that raindrop wouldn’t even exist without condensation of water that had evaporated from a previously existing source.

One of those chicken–egg things, I suppose, except with liquids instead of animals 😂

Posted in Life, Nature, Photography | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Unhappy Birthday

Taken near the NE corner of Jefferson and Wisconsin in downtown Milwaukee on a Saturday morning in early August. There’s a story here. I’m guessing it’s a sad one.

Posted in Food, Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Waiting Room

Not that there would be any doubt in your mind that this is what you’re looking at. All that’s missing is a plant in the corner 😀

 

 

Posted in Photography | Tagged | 4 Comments

Fiserv Forum Skywalk

Taken with my iPhone while sitting on Juneau, facing west, at the 6th Street stoplight. I really enjoy seeing this building from different perspectives, at different times of day, and in different seasons. Always something new.

Posted in architecture, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Weeds on a Milwaukee sidewalk

Gray morning in Milwaukee, but these weeds in the 1900 block of West Vliet caught my eye as I was driving past, so I had to stop and get out in the drizzling rain to take a picture. Maybe I should call them wildflowers instead of weeds, though, because they’re so pretty, as if someone had deliberately planted them. Except for the school sign and the public works markings spray painted on the sidewalk, doesn’t this scene kind of resemble a garden path you might see in a magazine?

P.S. – I was curious suddenly about where Vliet Street got its name. Here is an article from Urban Milwaukee with some background. Apparently Vliet came to town with Byron Kilbourn in Milwaukee’s early days. He was the person who surveyed Kilbourntown (the area west of the Milwaukee River) and therefore got to have one of the streets in this new town named after him.

Posted in History, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

A tour of public sculpture along Milwaukee’s Riverwalk and Wisconsin Avenue

A photo of my colleague, Margaret Dwyer, and me with “The Bronze Fonz,” taken during last Saturday’s walking tour of public sculptures along the Milwaukee Riverwalk and Wisconsin Avenue. We led a group of MSOE students on the two-hour walk as part of our research on using public art in engineering education.

Margaret and I got a Summer Faculty Development Grant this year for a project we titled “Connecting the Classroom and Public Art at MSOE: ‘Scientia Sine Arte Nihil Est‘”—which basically means (in Latin) “Science without art is nothing.”

We borrowed that phrase from our friends at the Grohmann Museum (the building where our department’s faculty offices are also housed). They have it printed on T-shirts you can buy in the gift shop. It’s a nice twist on the original quote from 14th-century architect Jean Mignot: “Ars sine scientia nihil est,” or “Art without science is nothing.” Mignot was a French architect called in to evaluate the Milan Cathedral for structural issues during its construction, as that project required stones to be lifted to new heights, literally. When you’re talking Gothic cathedrals with soaring vaulted ceilings and spires stretching heavenward, art without science would be very dangerous indeed.

So anyway, back to our summer grant. The IRB approved project was Margaret’s brainchild, and fortunately she asked if I’d like to be a co-investigator. After our public art tour ended Saturday, the students had lunch on us and participated in a focus-group discussion about the sculptures and the connections they saw between the public art and their own majors’ engineering disciplines and coursework.

We still have to transcribe the students’ conversation (apparently we can upload our Audacity audio file to Otter.ai, which is a FAR cry from the manual transcriptions of audiocasette tapes I did for my dissertation a million years ago), and then we’re going to produce instructor materials to help our colleagues incorporate public art into their courses. We also hope to write a conference paper for next year’s ASEE conference . . . in Montreal!

Some photos from Saturday below (I didn’t take that many, sorry!).

First, before we even set out from the Grohmann Museum, where the group assembled, I saw this really cool truck parked across the street. The parking meters kind of ruin the picture, but you can make out its “hot rod” style even so.

This sculpture reminds of me of the Easter Island faces. Except it looks out over the Milwaukee River instead of the Pacific Ocean 🙂

At the Highland Avenue pedestrian bridge stand two metal urns. The work is listed as “Limitation Series: Bowls,” by Paul Sebben.

Did Sebben anticipate how the public might interact with large “bowls” lacking signage that identifies them as “art”? Was this intentional on his part? I hope so, because it’s sad if not.

One of my favorite pieces was Aqua Grylli, a highly detailed, puzzling, and provocative sculpture on the west bank of the river, about halfway between Kilbourn and Wells.

(Aside: Margaret used Aqua Grylli in our recruiting poster. I only just now noticed this: Don’t both “faces” in the featured sculptures look really angry? Thank goodness the text sells it!)

 

If you link over to the artist’s website (she is Beth Shahagian, a Milwaukee sculptor), you can see a photo of the sculpture from a ninety-degree angle as it must have appeared at its installation in 2001. Take a look at the stone base on the lefthand side of the picture on her website. It’s a solid gray color. (Actually, you can see that solid gray color better on her “company” website, here.)

But take a look at that same stone base now, which I photographed on Saturday from the west side of the sculpture, which is the same perspective as the sculptor’s photo is from.

First, on top of the stone base, but at the base of the archway, there are several turtles sunning themselves on what look to be rocks. Streams of water are etched into the bronze, flowing in rivulets across the bronze “riverbed” and among the turtles’ rocks.

Sadly I didn’t take a photo of the turtles from above. But here is one showing a sideways view, where you can see some symbols etched onto the side of the metal block. The dark piles jutting upward are the turtles on rocks.

In the photo below you can see where one of the streams flows across the side of the bronze block and down the stone base of the pedestal. What I LOVE is how once the metal oxidized, the patina’s green color was carried by rainwater along the carved “channel” to create a colorful stream flowing down the stone.

This intriguing sculpture has lots of detail associated with “magic” and “luck.” There’s a rabbit’s foot, a horseshoe, a cornicello (a “lucky horn” amulet), a hand making the “devil’s horn” symbol (known as le corna in Italian, a hand gesture aimed at warding off the “evil eye”), and a triangle with the word “abracadabra” written all over. Just as the left base (northernmost) is covered with turtles (considered auspcious in some cultures), the righthand base (southernmost) is covered with what we all decided looked like trilobites.

So I just now looked up “trilobites good luck” and found that, yes, apparently trilobites are considered symbols of good fortune. See this Wikipedia article on the Neodrepanura, which describes how in China the fossils are mined “for use as ‘bat stones’ or ‘swallow stones,’ as good luck charms and traditional medicines.”

Interestingly during our Saturday art walk, I noticed lots of rice scattered on the ground beneath the arch of the bronze wave upon which the creature’s chariot rides. Part of me wondered: Might the rice actually be part of the artwork? Does someone come around regularly to replenish this symbol of good luck after a windy day?

The sculpture is situated above a boat landing on the river. So the most likely scenario is that a wedding party arrived via Riverwalk or water to take their photos beneath the arch of this good-luck landmark. Probably people showered the couple with rice to make a good picture.

But I kind of like my theory better 🙂

I’ll try to post a little more on the sculptures this coming week. One (called “Common Comrades”) haunts me, so much so that I went back to it on Tuesday afternoon and took lots more photos. And I may return to take more. Here’s one.

[UPDATE: I finally wrote a whole separate blogpost about this sculpture, including a poem. You can read it HERE if you’re interested.]

Would you like new posts delivered to your inbox? To subscribe, click here.

Posted in Art, Higher education, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

TIX3

😂

Looked up from my desk this morning and noticed the “EXIT” sign outside my door.

Posted in Photography | Tagged | 7 Comments

Eleanor Roosevelt on “What’s My Line” and other famous things

I stumbled across a reference to this while doing something else online and couldn’t resist watching. In October 1953 Eleanor Roosevelt appeared as a “mystery guest” on the stump-the-panel quiz show “What’s My Line?” This episode, posted in its entirety on YouTube, including ads for Remington electric shavers, was fun to see for a few reasons.

First, one of the panelists is Bennett Cerf, one of the founders of Random House and an author/speaker, as well. Plus, I discovered after reading the Wikipedia article about him, he was the founder of the Famous Writers School, which offered correspondence courses for aspiring writers supposedly taught by famous authors. The Famous Writers School was the subject of an equally famous 1970 exposé article in The Atlantic Monthly by Jessica Mitford (who is even more famous for her funeral-industry exposé book, The American Way of Death). (Further aside: There certainly is a lot of “famous” stuff going on here. It’s about to get worse 😄)

One additional interesting thing about Bennett Cerf is that he was briefly married to actress Sylvia Sidney, whom many will recognize from Tim Burton’s Beetlejuice (a role for which she won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress) but who is most famous to me as the lead in Alfred Hitchcock’s Sabotage, which is the 1936 film in which Hitchcock famously (infamously) let a bomb carried by a child explode on a London bus. In a famous set of interviews that (the also-famous) filmmaker François Truffaut conducted with Alfred Hitchcock (so famous that he really doesn’t even need to be called “famous), Hitchcock discusses why that explosion was such a bad decision:

I made a serious mistake in having the little boy carry the bomb. A character who unknowingly carries a bomb around as if it were an ordinary package is bound to work up great suspense in the audience. The boy was involved in a situation that got him too much sympathy from the audience, so that when the bomb exploded and he was killed, the public was resentful.

The way to handle it would have been for Homolka to kill the boy deliberately, but without showing that on the screen, and then for the wife to avenge her young brother by killing Homolka.

To which Truffaut says

Even that solution, I think, might have been resented by the audience. Making a child die in a picture is a rather ticklish matter; it comes close to an abuse of cinematic power.

And to which Hitchcock concedes

I agree with that; it was a grave error on my part.

Here’s a link to the Google Books version of that interview.

Bennett Cerf was born and raised in New York City, so I’m not sure how to account for his accent (or speech impediment, maybe?) that glides over “r” sounds to resemble “w”s in a manner reminiscent of Elmer Fudd. In trying to find more information about this style of pronunciation, I discovered that the “w” sound is sometimes called the “Winchester ‘r’,” a reference to one of Britain’s famous “public” (private) schools and the aristocratic way of speaking referred to as “Received Pronunciation” (as in “acceptable,” in the way that only acceptable people are “received” in society), which in turn was adopted by broadcasters as the most easily understood pronunciation and became better known as BBC English. In America, especially following the introduction of “talkies” and the employment of diction instructors to teach Hollywood actors how to speak, this resulted in the strange psuedo-aristocratic, fake-British Mid-Atlantic accent of 1930s and ’40s stars like Katharine Hepburn and Tyrone Power. Apparently it was also an accent strived for by America’s upper classes during that same era. This passage from Wikipedia’s article on the Mid-Atlantic accent describes this unnatural way of speaking as a dialect called “World English,” invented by speech teachers to sound upper crust:

World English was a speech pattern that very specifically did not derive from any regional dialect pattern in England or America, although it clearly bears some resemblance to the speech patterns that were spoken in a few areas of New England, and a very considerable resemblance … to the pattern in England which was becoming defined in the 1920s as “RP” or “Received Pronunciation.” World English, then, was a creation of speech teachers, and boldly labeled as a class-based accent: the speech of persons variously described as “educated,” “cultivated,” or “cultured”; the speech of persons who moved in rarified social or intellectual circles and of those who might aspire to do so.

Hmm, according to Wikipedia, Bennett Cerf’s mother was heiress to a tobacco-distribution fortune. Maybe that “r” pronunciation was a reflection of Cerf’s social class? In any case, I’ve seen Bennett Cerf’s name here and there my whole life, so it was fun to see him in person on “What’s My Line?”

So on to Eleanor Roosevelt!

She appears halfway through the show, at the 14:25 minute mark (right after the commercial break). I was curious to know why they kept talking about the United Nations, like wondering if this mystery guest would be found in the neighborhood of the UN. A quick Google search revealed that Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed to the first U.S. delegation to the UN and served from December 31, 1945 till December 31, 1952. Additionally, Roosevelt was unanimously elected chair of the UN’s Commission on Human Rights, which she led from 1947-1951. It was under her leadership that the United Nations’ famous “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” was drafted and published.

I only ever knew of Eleanor Roosevelt as she was in her older age, looking very much as she does in her appearance on this show. So I was surprised to discover photos of her a few years ago as a young woman. Somehow I’d grown up thinking of her as someone who had never been youthful, probably because there were SO many photos and film segments depicting her in those later years when she was such a prominant public figure. But check it out: ER was a girl and young adult once, too!

 

From the National Archives via Wikipedia

From the National Archives via Wikipedia

Would you like new posts delivered to your inbox? To subscribe, click here.

 

Posted in History, Popular culture, Television | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Fiserv Forum roofline, south side, late afternoon

So many photos of this building are just waiting to be taken. There’s one image I’d like to capture along the north side looking west, but I don’t think my equipment is good enough to get it 😦

Posted in architecture, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , | 2 Comments