War of the Worlds – Fake News! About Fake News!

So 80 years ago at Halloween time, Orson Welles and his Mercury Theatre of the Air broadcast the historic War of the Worlds radio drama that set off a nationwide panic at the (fake!) news of Martians landing in New Jersey and launching an attack on Americans.

Although UK newspaper The Telegraph claimed in an article two years ago that reports of widespread panic were a myth (fake news about fake news!), I personally give way more credence to the reporting done on the scene by the United Press International (UPI) on the actual night of the broadcast itself, October 30, 1938 (click here to link to the archived article on the UPI’s website). And here’s a Washington Post article from October 30, 1968, marking thirty years on from that broadcast and associated panic.

According to that UPI report, people in New Jersey fled their homes in the immediate aftermath of the show’s announcement that areas nearby had been gas-bombed by the aliens. The Newark, New Jersey, police department received 2,000 phone calls within an hour of the radio show’s initial reports of the attack. And because people in New Jersey were calling their relatives across the country to warn them of the Martians’ invasion—and this was in the era of really expensive long-distance telephone rates, so imagine the significance of such a phone call on the receiving end—the panic spread quickly beyond New Jersey and the East Coast. And because all of those relatives in Kansas and elsewhere began calling their local authorities to get more news (because no Twitter, Facebook, or TELEVISION!), the fake news about fake news prompted even more generation of fake news. With devastating effect: According to the UPI article, at least two heart attacks and a stroke in Tulsa, Oklahoma, were attributed directly to the radio show.

I remember listening to a rebroadcast of The War of the Worlds right around Halloween when I was a child. Actually, now that I think about it, I imagine it was probably around Halloween in 1968, which would have been the 30th anniversary of the original broadcast. Listening to that rebroadcast was fascinating and marvelous, and I felt somehow privileged that I was able to experience this historic event for myself. It was like a time-machine connection to the 1930s, especially with the broadcast  interrupted by the news of invasion being a show featuring the music of Ramon Raquello and his orchestra coming to us live from “The Meridian Room” of the Hotel Park Plaza in New York.

It was especially interesting to see how the news story developed. From the initial observation of an atmospheric disturbance somewhere over Nova Scotia (I think it was) to the first reports coming in from New Jersey to, finally, all hell breaking loose and basically full-out war between the Martian invaders and us.

I found the complete broadcast on YouTube, uploaded by someone named David Webb, who has a YouTube channel devoted mostly to musicians from his hometown of Basingstoke in southern England. (Thank you, Mr. Webb!)

Enjoy 🙂

Posted in History, Life, Popular culture | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Buses, Buses Everywhere

A kid-friendly production must be happening at the Marcus Center for the Performing Arts right now. On my Starbucks run this morning I saw at least 13-15 school buses total parked along Kilbourn, State, and both sides of Water. You might have to enlarge the photo to see them all, and even then there are even more you can get only glimpses of beyond the buses in the center. Weren’t field trips the best?!!!

 

Posted in Life, Milwaukee | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Changes at MSOE – A snapshot of the old and the (very) new

Walking back to my office from the scholarship luncheon today (a really nice event where MSOE scholarship sponsors and recipients get to meet over a meal), I noticed the old Blatz Brewing Company logo atop MSOE’s Alumni Partnership Center.

The Alumni Partnership Center once served as the company offices for the Valentin Blatz Brewing Co., and the building still contains several walk-in safes and other remnants of its days as a major brewery’s headquarters. I’m in that building a few times a year, mostly in connection with MSOE’s Great Books events, but I never have occasion to see it from across the street. So today I noticed for the first time how the old Blatz logo contains

  1. The “Brauerstern” (brewer’s star)
  2. The initials “V” and “B” entwined
  3. A hop flower (beneath the V and B)
  4. A sheaf of barley (across the top)

Cool to see! Here’s a closeup showing that same basic symbol on an old Blatz label.

So anyway, the Blatz logo is obviously the “old” in today’s post. The “new” is the huge crane that dominated most of the MSOE landscape across the street from where I stood. That crane is part of the construction project that will eventually result in MSOE’s Dwight and Dian Diercks Computational Science Hall, which will house the school’s new AI program. Very exciting! (My photo below is about half a “panorama” shot, hence the weirdly bent street . . . )

 

Posted in architecture, Food, Higher education, History, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

The impact of “small” differences

I happened to look up as I was walking into the Red Arrow Starbucks this morning, and I saw a photo. I took a couple pictures but can’t decide which of these I like best. They’re practically the same, just taken from slightly different angles and therefore having slightly different compositions.

I think maybe I prefer the first one, because I like the upward-jutting angle of the cement and railing of the plaza above and the way it dominates the lower half and foreground of the picture.

But I’m including my second photo, too. Taken from slightly farther away and therefore from a shallower angle, it doesn’t emphasize the concrete’s angle so much. I also like the colors here better. The gray-blue sky sort of changes the way I perceive the office building. It’s features seem softer and more monochromatic, with less contrast among the different colors. The overall effect is more calm than the first photo. Where the first photo feels darker, more dynamic and bold, somehow the second feels lighter, more peaceful and quiet.

Here they are side by side for easier comparison. Each has different arguments in its favor. Maybe there’s no clear “best” choice. But since I find myself mired in indecision, I thought I’d throw the question out to you. Which do you like best?

 

 

Posted in Art, Creativity, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Gaining clarity from a second look around

So about three weeks ago I posted this photo:

One of the things I liked about it was the crisscrossed bands of shadows across the lawn. I assumed it came from the sun shining through the mall of trees on the hillside. But yesterday I realized I was wrong about the source of light and shadow. It was actually reflected from the office building’s windows above.

My teaching/learning takeaway? It pays to see things from multiple vantage points, including temporal. And it also helps not to make idle assumptions 🙂  As you can see in this photo, the trees are still thick with leaves, so the sun could not have cast crisscrossed lines of shadow through them, something I’d have realized if I’d paused to look around more and take in the entire scene.

Posted in Learning, Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Subsequent staircase thoughts on black and white

Yesterday Karen commented that she liked the black-and-white quality of the middle staircase photo. And that was really interesting to me, because even though it looked black and white, it was actually a color photo. Something about the way light was reflecting caused the green slate of the steps to fade away.

So then I fooled around with trying out some of the black-and-white filters in my iPhone camera, just to see what the image might look like in black and white. Here are the results.

First, here is the original photo. You can barely make out the green tint of the stairs’ natural color. (I can tell at a glance that this one is my original, though, because of the tiny triangle of green at the upper right corner. I’m not sure what that was, but it was background that showed beyond the staircase riser. I thought about cropping it out but decided not to because I didn’t have time. Now I’m glad I didn’t because that little green patch is my quick “cheat” for telling the original apart from the mono black-and-white 😄)

Here is my first pass at black and white. It’s the “Mono” filter.

Next the “Silvertone” filter.

And finally, the “Noir” filter.

Of all these, I think I may like the original best, with its tiniest hint of green underlying the overall black-and-white effect. But they all appeal to me in different ways. Which do you like most?

 

 

 

(Side by side here in the same order: original, mono, silvertone, noir.)

Would you like new posts delivered to your inbox? To subscribe, click here.

Posted in Photography | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Thoughts on the Staircase

Coming upstairs just now from my department meeting, I really liked the patterns of shadow and light on the staircase. Took a few quick pictures, natch 🙂

As I walked up the stairs . . .

Near the top step at the second floor landing . . .

On the second-floor landing, looking down . . .

I think I like the photo in the middle best, mostly because in the absence of carpet and railings to orient you, it’s easier to lose track of what this actually is and take in the image as an abstraction more “form” than content. Anyway, I like it!

Posted in Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Top Down

I took this photo of our birch tree this week on a sunny early evening as I arrived home from work.

Trees die from the top down, something I learned from the arborist years ago when our birch tree was attacked by birch borers. Most of the uppermost center branches lost their leaves, many small branches themselves started to fall, and the entire crown started looking very sparse. That’s when we began to take serious care of all our trees, and the birch tree most of all. Birches are very fragile, which is why you rarely see one as large (and old) as ours. They need plenty of water during hot, dry spells, and they need to be fortified against insect infestations regularly.

A couple more interesting birch tree facts.

First, birch trees are highly allergenic. Not only will the pollen itself make you miserable every spring (runny nose, sneezing, etc.), but it may also lead you to have allergic reactions to FOOD. This is actually a thing! So let’s assume you’re not particularly allergic to a certain food, say walnuts. A birch tree can cause you to become temporarily allergic. That is, if you eat walnuts anywhere near a birch tree during its pollen-producing phase, you might have an allergic reaction to the walnuts BECAUSE of the birch pollen. Isn’t that crazy?

Second, birch trees do an amazing job of removing contaminants from soil, especially heavy metals and petroleum products like diesel fuel or crude oil. A scientist I used to know from UWM (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee) told me about that, and I just now looked it up online to confirm that my memory (from like 15 years ago) was accurate.

Anyway, since trees die from the top down, I guess it makes sense that their “little” deaths each autumn would occur in the same manner.

Posted in Milwaukee, Nature | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

What’s in a tagline (Part 2): Changing my blog’s identity AGAIN

Welcome to KatherineWikoff.com, version 3.0. Today marks the launch of a new tagline for my blog’s “identity,” and I think I’ve FINALLY found something that fits.

Version 1.0

Starting out in 2012, I subtitled my blog “Ideas on creativity, innovation, lifelong learning, and other random stuff.” That tagline served me well for nearly five years. Well, maybe “served me well” is an overstatement. I thought I was going to be writing a lot more about those first three topics than I ever actually did. What saved it was the “random stuff” add-on at the end, which had initially been an afterthought. As my blog hit its one-year, two-year, three-year, four-year anniversaries, I came to realize that “random stuff” pretty much constituted my blog’s entire bread and butter.

Version 2.0

In January 2017 I decided it was time to address the rift between what my blog purported to be and the reality of how it had actually turned out. Changing my tagline was a big project for me, one I took seriously. I made lists of blog topics and descriptors, drafted potential taglines, edited the heck out of them, and painstakingly made my eventual way to a new tagline that I hoped captured my blog’s heart and soul.

Searching for meaning. Making connections. Noticing beauty. Discovering insights. Finding inspiration. Tending imagination. Trying to say yes.

Ugh. I hated it from the start. It was aspirational, but it definitely wasn’t me. Too sappy, too pretentious. Very embarrassing, like who did I even think I was? Yet I had nothing better, so I just left it. I didn’t have the heart (or the time!) to go through that whole exercise again.

However . . .

Version 3.0

After not paying attention to that sappy tagline for the past year and a half, I finally noticed it again yesterday when I put up the “Ha-Ha” post.

UGH!!! I think I’ve been in denial: avoiding it, ignoring it, pretending it didn’t exist. I’m even shorter on time now than I was in January 2017, but I realized I just couldn’t stand the idea of that disgusting tagline representing me online for even one more day.

So this morning I had maybe fifteen minutes before a meeting. I pulled up my WordPress dashboard and started typing a new tagline right into the little box. No lists, no rough drafts, no agonizing over my blog’s identity. (Or, God forbid, my “brand.”) I just tried to think clearly about the kinds of posts I put up and describe them as simply as possible. And quickly, racing to finish before my meeting began.

Ironic, right, how sometimes the thrown-together mess turns out to be WAY  better than the work of art so assiduously labored over? It rarely pays to think too much. Which is one very hard lesson for an academic to learn 🙂

 

Posted in Creativity, Writing, blogging | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

A “Ha-Ha” Aha

In reading a book recently, I came across a reference to something I’d never heard of before: a “ha-ha.”

This turned out to be a fun little piece of landscape trivia to learn about. A ha-ha is a feature of landscaping that allows for both the practicality of a fence or wall while maintaining the illusion of natural countryside. So one might look out across the lawn of a grand country house in England and see sheep grazing picturesquely in the meadows beyond with no worry about those sheep potentially moving out of their proper place in the vista and finding their way right up to the front door.

Basically, a ha-ha seems very similar to the moat in a zoo exhibit. It keeps animals inside their enclosure by presenting them with a wall at the bottom of a slope, yet it allows the people outside of the enclosure the pleasure of imagining that there is no barrier between them and the animals they observe. The name “ha-ha” is derived directly from the the sound of amused surprise one might make upon discovering that a beautiful landscape of natural countryside is actually a fenced-in pasture for livestock.

The deer parks kept by English aristocracy also featured these ditches dug all the way around the sprawling wilderness, again so as to contain the wild creatures within the grounds. In fact, according to the Wikipedia article on ha-has, the deer parks featured one additional barrier, a fence at the top of the ha-ha wall. A deer from outside the park could easily jump in but once inside would find it impossible to get back out. Ha-ha, indeed.

That fence atop the wall turns out to be called a “pale.” Isn’t that interesting? My whole life I’ve heard the phrase “beyond the pale” to describe something egregiously beyond the bounds of decency. Just as my students do with expressions they’ve heard but have no practical knowledge of (a “doggy dog” world, a hard “road” to hoe, etc.), I constructed a meaning for “beyond the pale” that had nothing to do with what it actually referred to. My mental image involved someone encountering behavior so bad that it would cause them to “pale,” in terms of having their face turn white from the sudden loss of blood in their head and coming dangerously close to fainting due to that bad behavior they’d just been exposed to. “Beyond the pale” to me meant behavior even worse than the ordinary brand of bad behavior that might cause a person to pale. It makes sense, right?

Usually I like knowing all the behind-the-scenes info, so you’d think I’d be happy to have learned  that “beyond the pale” means “on the other side of the fence.”

Except . . . how prosaic is that? I greatly preferred my incorrect (but far more poetic and romantic) understanding of the term 🙂

Posted in architecture, Books and reading, Creativity, Learning, Life, Nature | Tagged , | 6 Comments