Apertus (Public AI) versus ChatGPT in a poetry challenge

I love the idea of the Swiss AI Initiative’s Apertus and Public AI. As sort of the Linux of LLMs, Apertus, via the Public AI Initiative, aspires to democratize generative AI:

Public AI refers to the development, deployment, and maintenance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems that are open, transparent, and accessible to all members of society. It’s about creating AI technology that benefits the public good, is accountable, fair, and respectful of human rights and ethical standards.

Unlike proprietary AI systems that are controlled by a few powerful entities, public AI initiatives aim to democratize AI by allowing its development, dissemination, and control to be shared among various public and private actors, including governments, research institutions, civil society organizations, and the wider public.

Released just a month ago (September 2), Apertus is something I learned of only just today. And because I appreciate the general philosophy behind it, I thought I’d give the Public AI chat a test drive.

I’ve been using ChatGPT for creative writing exercises lately (over the past year), so naturally the first thing I thought of was to give a quick poetry prompt to Public AI and see what it was able to do with it.

UGH, terrible!

So I turned around and submitted an identical prompt to ChatGPT.

And OH MY GOD!!!

ChatGPT won.

Hands down, decisive victory, not even close.

I copied and pasted both of my attempts into a single document and created a PDF. If you’re interested in seeing the head-to-head comparison of these two AIs, take a look. It’s like reading the work of a fourth grader steeped in the archaic style of poetry from 100+ years ago versus reading a rough draft produced by a decently talented adult who reads contemporary literature.

Link to PDF with both of my chats and resulting poems HERE.

First try for a ChatGPT image of pumpkins

(P.S. – Although I need to get back to work now, you might find it amusing to read about the many ChatGPT image-generation FAILS that I went through in an effort to illustrate this post. The image above was the first one out of the gate. Okay, but upon reflection was not what I wanted. Tried again and again, but ChatGPT kept getting it comically wrong. I’ll share in a post tomorrow 🙂 )

 

Posted in Creative Practice in the Age of AI, Creativity, generative AI, Learning, poetry, Writing with AI, Writing, blogging | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald

Well. I’ve never cried in a museum before, but the Edmund Fitzgerald exhibition at the Grohmann Museum had me in tears yesterday afternoon.

I was making my way through the special exhibit’s gallery, looking at photographs and paintings of the doomed ship, which sank 50 years ago (November 10,1975), when I unexpectedly heard the opening notes of Gordon Lightfoot’s song.

In the far corner is a screen that loops both the song (with video of the ship) and a video-recorded interview with Captain Bernie Cooper of the Arthur M. Anderson, another ship that was 10 miles behind the Fitzgerald out on Lake Superior that night. Cooper was in radio contact with the Edmund Fitzgerald’s captain right up until the time the other ship disappeared from radar. In the video Cooper speculates that the Fitzgerald must have gone down fast, too fast to issue a mayday. Despite the dangerous weather, the Arthur M. Anderson went back out on the lake that night, even after they’d already made it safely to port, to search for survivors.

underwater image of the sunken Edmund Fitzgerald, with the name of the ship visible
I don’t know, I’ve heard that song for close to 50 years now, but it never affected me the way it did yesterday, especially watching video of rough seas breaking over the ship while Captain Cooper talked about the two most likely scenarios he could envision behind the ship’s sinking and seeing the photos of the men who died, along with their names, ages, and home cities—all while surrounded by photos, paintings, and models of the Fitzgerald and the Arthur M. Anderson.

Very moving.

Posted in Art, History, Life, Milwaukee | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Getting in on the discussion of F. Scott Fitzgerald and football’s two-platoon system

This morning, I noticed that a blog post I wrote 11 years ago was getting lots of views, and traffic seemed to be coming from both Reddit and Bluesky. So I did some quick digging and found that, for whatever reasons that are still not entirely clear to me, a discussion on F. Scott Fitzgerald”s contribution to the sport was trending on Bluesky, and from there people must’ve been going over to Reddit discussions and then linking over to my blog post.

Anyway, I updated that post to include new links to the source material, and it occurred to me that I ought to share with you so you can be up on the latest discussions, too! 😀

Here’s the link to my 2014 post, “F. Scott Fitzgerald: Football Genius?

Posted in Books and reading, History, Popular culture | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sunset, Milwaukee

Heading east on State Street, stopped at the traffic light at 12th Street. I love the way the sun reflects off the glass of the Aurora Sinai hospital skywalk and, farther east, slightly left of center, the 1000 North Water Street office tower, and even farther east, some other new apartment building that I should know the name of but don’t. Whatever it is, it’s even closer to Lake Michigan than the Yankee Hill Apartments, which are several blocks east of the 1000 North Water Street building and are the skinny brick building in the distance that’s far beyond the parking garage in the foreground but right in front of the taller (no name) building’s shiny, gold reflection.

Whew, that was a long sentence and probably way more description than you actually needed or wanted. So maybe just ignore all that and enjoy tonight’s sunset on me! 😀

Posted in Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Portrait of a Textile Worker (and Milwaukee’s Water Tower Dragon)

I’m teaching two sections of the freshman composition class at MSOE, and among the things we cover in this course are how to “read” art as a “text” and how to talk about any work of art. We spend about three weeks learning art concepts, we visit the Grohmann Museum and do some formal analysis of a couple paintings and sculptures, and then students take a class period to wander around the museum on their own and select an artwork to analyze and present to the class (in five minutes, very informal).

Today was our first day of focusing on art in our class (as opposed to writing, rhetoric, and composition). We have a whole list of terms and concepts (like color, lighting, lines, shapes, perspective, composition, etc.), so I go term by term, showing examples of the various concepts and discussing them.

When I reached the point of talking about mediums/media and materials used in creating a work of art in today’s lecture, I suddenly thought of Portrait of a Textile Worker, a large quilt created by Milwaukee native Terese Agnew that is part of the Museum of Arts and Design’s permanent collection. The “portrait” of this woman sewing in a factory among other garment workers was created entirely from clothing labels. Agnew needed thousands of labels in order to have the broad palette of colors and tones needed to “paint” her picture. People spread the word of Agnew’s project, went into their closets to cut labels out of their clothes, and the raw materials for this quilt poured in from around the world.

Although I remembered the quilt and the garment worker’s image earlier today, I couldn’t immediately recall Agnew’s name. But I did remember the spectacular dragon she created and installed in the mid-1980s on the North Point Water Tower (a fabulous Gothic-looking structure similar to Chicago’s water tower that famously survived the Great Chicago Fire in 1871), so I just Googled that and found this fun article.

Like Portrait of a Textile Worker, the 1985 Milwaukee water-tower dragon project was a collaborative effort. This is something I always found fascinating about Agnew. Even very, very early in her career, when she was only about 25 years old, she seemed to understand the power of partnership. With every city hearing that she had to present at to win approval for moving forward, word began spread about her dragon project (basically, she looked at this medieval-castle-looking tower one day and thought: wouldn’t it be great to have a dragon perched up there?). In the end, she had a large(ish) crew of people helping her hoist the massive sculpture up there and get it securely installed. Although it apparently remained on the tower for a mere five days, I can still vividly remember seeing it and thinking it was fabulous.

With Portrait of a Textile Worker, created about 20 years after the dragon project, not only did Agnew have people sending her the raw materials she needed to construct the quilt, but she also, and possibly as a consequence, then had a huge base of supporters who were willing to help raise the necessary funds and otherwise contribute to the effort to get a museum to purchase and display this artwork.

It’s ironic. We have this collective mental picture in our heads of artists and writers as individual geniuses, the lone poet or painter toiling away in an unheated garret apartment (a romantic image, perhaps, but no doubt uncomfortable).

The reality, in my experience, is usually the exact opposite.

Successful artists and writers are often more like project managers. They do the creative work, of course, but they also collaborate with others along the way and take the lead on tedious but necessary things like moving a project through the process of getting approvals from, say, the Historic Preservation Committee, the Milwaukee Arts Commission, the water tower landmark trust, the entire Common Council, the Milwaukee County engineers, and the mayor—all of which Agnew had to do for her dragon back in 1985. They don’t wait for inspiration; they have deadlines and multiple irons in the fire.

As Steve Jobs famously put it: Real artists ship.

Posted in Art, Creativity, Milwaukee | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

“Adventures in AI” special exhibition wraps up this weekend

If you happen to be in San Francisco in the next couple of days, you might want to check out the final weekend of this temporary exhibit at the Exploratorium museum, running through Sunday (Sept. 14) at Pier 15 on the waterfront. Sponsored by Anthropic (makers of Claude), the exhibit explains how AI works (in a fun, clear way 🙂 ), provides some hands-on opportunities to try it out, and also highlights some of the social and environmental dangers by bringing guests into “physical” contact with them via immersive activities.

Link to the “Adventures in AI” exhibit’s web page: https://www.exploratorium.edu/visit/calendar/ai

Posted in Digital society, generative AI, Technology, Travel | Leave a comment

Wednesday morning, September 10, in downtown Milwaukee

Just two photos from my morning drive to work.

First, I was on 10th Street just west of the Wisconsin Club, housed in the 1843 mansion built by Alexander Mitchell, founder of the Marine Bank and president of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway, later known as the Milwaukee Road, a major Midwestern transportation force for many years, plus grandfather of Billy Mitchell, who commanded all air combat units in France during World War I, who had a primary part in creating the United States Air Force, and for whom Milwaukee’s Mitchell Internation Airport is named.

Aside: Another interesting FYI about Billy Mitchell is that he’s buried in Milwaukee’s well-known Forest Home Cemetery, which is not only a beautiful and unusual place somewhat reminiscent of the Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris but is similarly also the final resting place of many (local) luminaries. (The Père Lachaise is home to the graves of many world-renowned figures like Balzac, Chopin, Fourier, Colette, and, of course, Jim Morrison 🙂 ).

But anyway, I was headed north on 10th Street, stopped for a traffic light just west of the Wisconsin Club and just east of (and above) the freeway, when I glanced slightly left and noticed these comma-shaped, spiral-looped clouds.

three parallel, comma-shaped cloud wisps

Aren’t they cool? I’ve never seen clouds look like that. I don’t know what they indicate in terms of pressure systems or anything else meteorological, but I took a quick picture before the light changed so I could remember them.

The next photo is another stopped-at-a-traffic-light moment, this time at the corner of Water and Kilbourn. I just liked the way the boulevard plantings framed the buildings, although I know the resulting photograph itself is kind of a clichéd “convention bureau” or “visit Milwaukee” kind of image.

But I don’t care. Sometimes bland, “conventional” pictures are nice, too 🙂

Posted in Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Art on a sunny September day: warm glow, crisp shadow

This little work of art sits on the windowsill in my office.

I’ve photographed it before.

It makes me happy.

Today late-morning sun struck at a high angle, casting a well-defined shadow and giving the copper wire a warm, mellow glow. It brightened my day, so I thought I’d share with you and maybe brighten yours a little, too! 🙂

 

Posted in Art | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Should AI Get Legal Rights? | WIRED

Very interesting article published yesterday in Wired magazine. “Model welfare” is an emerging field of research that seeks to determine whether AI is conscious and, if so, how humanity should respond (e.g., should AI have/deserve “rights”?)
— Read on www.wired.com/story/model-welfare-artificial-intelligence-sentience/

Posted in Creative Practice in the Age of AI, Digital society, generative AI | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

We must build AI for people; not to be a person

An essay worth reading from Microsoft AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman:

We must build AI for people; not to be a person
— Read on mustafa-suleyman.ai/seemingly-conscious-ai-is-coming

Posted in “Reblogged” posts from other writers, generative AI | Tagged , | 3 Comments