Portrait of a Textile Worker (and Milwaukee’s Water Tower Dragon)

I’m teaching two sections of the freshman composition class at MSOE, and among the things we cover in this course are how to “read” art as a “text” and how to talk about any work of art. We spend about three weeks learning art concepts, we visit the Grohmann Museum and do some formal analysis of a couple paintings and sculptures, and then students take a class period to wander around the museum on their own and select an artwork to analyze and present to the class (in five minutes, very informal).

Today was our first day of focusing on art in our class (as opposed to writing, rhetoric, and composition). We have a whole list of terms and concepts (like color, lighting, lines, shapes, perspective, composition, etc.), so I go term by term, showing examples of the various concepts and discussing them.

When I reached the point of talking about mediums/media and materials used in creating a work of art in today’s lecture, I suddenly thought of Portrait of a Textile Worker, a large quilt created by Milwaukee native Terese Agnew that is part of the Museum of Arts and Design’s permanent collection. The “portrait” of this woman sewing in a factory among other garment workers was created entirely from clothing labels. Agnew needed thousands of labels in order to have the broad palette of colors and tones needed to “paint” her picture. People spread the word of Agnew’s project, went into their closets to cut labels out of their clothes, and the raw materials for this quilt poured in from around the world.

Although I remembered the quilt and the garment worker’s image earlier today, I couldn’t immediately recall Agnew’s name. But I did remember the spectacular dragon she created and installed in the mid-1980s on the North Point Water Tower (a fabulous Gothic-looking structure similar to Chicago’s water tower that famously survived the Great Chicago Fire in 1871), so I just Googled that and found this fun article.

Like Portrait of a Textile Worker, the 1985 Milwaukee water-tower dragon project was a collaborative effort. This is something I always found fascinating about Agnew. Even very, very early in her career, when she was only about 25 years old, she seemed to understand the power of partnership. With every city hearing that she had to present at to win approval for moving forward, word began spread about her dragon project (basically, she looked at this medieval-castle-looking tower one day and thought: wouldn’t it be great to have a dragon perched up there?). In the end, she had a large(ish) crew of people helping her hoist the massive sculpture up there and get it securely installed. Although it apparently remained on the tower for a mere five days, I can still vividly remember seeing it and thinking it was fabulous.

With Portrait of a Textile Worker, created about 20 years after the dragon project, not only did Agnew have people sending her the raw materials she needed to construct the quilt, but she also, and possibly as a consequence, then had a huge base of supporters who were willing to help raise the necessary funds and otherwise contribute to the effort to get a museum to purchase and display this artwork.

It’s ironic. We have this collective mental picture in our heads of artists and writers as individual geniuses, the lone poet or painter toiling away in an unheated garret apartment (a romantic image, perhaps, but no doubt uncomfortable).

The reality, in my experience, is usually the exact opposite.

Successful artists and writers are often more like project managers. They do the creative work, of course, but they also collaborate with others along the way and take the lead on tedious but necessary things like moving a project through the process of getting approvals from, say, the Historic Preservation Committee, the Milwaukee Arts Commission, the water tower landmark trust, the entire Common Council, the Milwaukee County engineers, and the mayor—all of which Agnew had to do for her dragon back in 1985. They don’t wait for inspiration; they have deadlines and multiple irons in the fire.

As Steve Jobs famously put it: Real artists ship.

Posted in Art, Creativity, Milwaukee | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

“Adventures in AI” special exhibition wraps up this weekend

If you happen to be in San Francisco in the next couple of days, you might want to check out the final weekend of this temporary exhibit at the Exploratorium museum, running through Sunday (Sept. 14) at Pier 15 on the waterfront. Sponsored by Anthropic (makers of Claude), the exhibit explains how AI works (in a fun, clear way 🙂 ), provides some hands-on opportunities to try it out, and also highlights some of the social and environmental dangers by bringing guests into “physical” contact with them via immersive activities.

Link to the “Adventures in AI” exhibit’s web page: https://www.exploratorium.edu/visit/calendar/ai

Posted in Digital society, generative AI, Technology, Travel | Leave a comment

Wednesday morning, September 10, in downtown Milwaukee

Just two photos from my morning drive to work.

First, I was on 10th Street just west of the Wisconsin Club, housed in the 1843 mansion built by Alexander Mitchell, founder of the Marine Bank and president of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway, later known as the Milwaukee Road, a major Midwestern transportation force for many years, plus grandfather of Billy Mitchell, who commanded all air combat units in France during World War I, who had a primary part in creating the United States Air Force, and for whom Milwaukee’s Mitchell Internation Airport is named.

Aside: Another interesting FYI about Billy Mitchell is that he’s buried in Milwaukee’s well-known Forest Home Cemetery, which is not only a beautiful and unusual place somewhat reminiscent of the Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris but is similarly also the final resting place of many (local) luminaries. (The Père Lachaise is home to the graves of many world-renowned figures like Balzac, Chopin, Fourier, Colette, and, of course, Jim Morrison 🙂 ).

But anyway, I was headed north on 10th Street, stopped for a traffic light just west of the Wisconsin Club and just east of (and above) the freeway, when I glanced slightly left and noticed these comma-shaped, spiral-looped clouds.

three parallel, comma-shaped cloud wisps

Aren’t they cool? I’ve never seen clouds look like that. I don’t know what they indicate in terms of pressure systems or anything else meteorological, but I took a quick picture before the light changed so I could remember them.

The next photo is another stopped-at-a-traffic-light moment, this time at the corner of Water and Kilbourn. I just liked the way the boulevard plantings framed the buildings, although I know the resulting photograph itself is kind of a clichéd “convention bureau” or “visit Milwaukee” kind of image.

But I don’t care. Sometimes bland, “conventional” pictures are nice, too 🙂

Posted in Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Art on a sunny September day: warm glow, crisp shadow

This little work of art sits on the windowsill in my office.

I’ve photographed it before.

It makes me happy.

Today late-morning sun struck at a high angle, casting a well-defined shadow and giving the copper wire a warm, mellow glow. It brightened my day, so I thought I’d share with you and maybe brighten yours a little, too! 🙂

 

Posted in Art | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Should AI Get Legal Rights? | WIRED

Very interesting article published yesterday in Wired magazine. “Model welfare” is an emerging field of research that seeks to determine whether AI is conscious and, if so, how humanity should respond (e.g., should AI have/deserve “rights”?)
— Read on www.wired.com/story/model-welfare-artificial-intelligence-sentience/

Posted in Creative Practice in the Age of AI, Digital society, generative AI | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

We must build AI for people; not to be a person

An essay worth reading from Microsoft AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman:

We must build AI for people; not to be a person
— Read on mustafa-suleyman.ai/seemingly-conscious-ai-is-coming

Posted in “Reblogged” posts from other writers, generative AI | Tagged , | 3 Comments

New “bloom patterns” type of origami introduces new possibilities in engineering

One of my favorite scenes in the movie Working Girl comes near the end, where our heroine, Tess (Melanie Griffith), seizes a last-ditch opportunity to stop her boss, Katherine (Sigourney Weaver) from stealing her deal. After Jack (Harrison Ford) corrals their potential client into an elevator alone with them for the ride up to the mergers and acquisitions offices high in the World Trade Center, Tess delivers the OG high-stakes elevator pitch by explaining how she came up with her inspired, out-of-left-field idea that the client’s company, looking to invest in television networks, acquire a radio network instead.

 

And here’s the text in print (in case the clip is ever taken down by the person who posted it on YouTube, or in case you’d rather just read):

Okay.  See, this is Forbes.  It’s just your basic article about how you were looking to expand into broadcasting, right?  Okay now, the same day—I’ll never forget this—I’m reading page six of the Post, and there’s this item on Bobby Stein, the radio talk show guy who does all those gross jokes about Ethiopia and the Betty Ford Center.  Well, anyway, he’s hosting this charity auction that night: Real blue bloods, and won’t that be funny. Now turn the page to Suzy, who does the society stuff, and  there’s this picture of your daughter. See, nice picture.  And she’s helping to organize the charity ball.  So I started to think: Trask . . . radio, Trask . . . radio.”  And then I hooked up with Jack, and he came on board with Metro, and…and so now here we are.

In a similar, though much lower-stakes, moment earlier in the film, Tess suggests to Katherine that they serve dim sum dumplings at a reception instead of the usual appetizers. When she mentions that she’s been reading about them in W (a fashion magazine), a snooty colleague of her boss sneers, “You read W?”—the implication being that Tess, a Staten Island girl with the accent to prove it and a wardrobe to match, couldn’t possibly be reading a “cool kids” publication like W.

Tess keeps her cool, though. Her response (and the setup for her later moment of triumph) is blunt and simple:

I read a lot of things. I mean, you never know where the big ideas could come from. You know?

Changing the subject a bit, but along these same lines, I just found an extrememly interesting (and very readable!) article, “Bloom patterns: radially expansive, developable and flat-foldable origami,” written by an engineering professor, an origami artist, and an engineering student who has been fascinated by origami his entire life.

I actually listed the authors backwards just now to call attention to something unusual—and the reverse of how publishing ordinarily works in the fields of science, mathematics, and engineering. In the case of this article, the engineering student, Zhongyouan Wang, is actually the lead author!

“Bloom patterns: radially expansive, developable and flat-foldable origami”  https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rspa.2025.0299

As he should be, because Wang is the creator of a unique new type of origami that “blooms” in radials from a center, like a flower. Although many different “bloom pattern” design variations may be created, they will all have that centerpoint in common, like the flower head or disk at the center of a daisy.

Cover, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Volume 481, Issue 2320 (Aug 2025)

Cover, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Volume 481, Issue 2320 (Aug 2025)

From a news story published by Brigham Young University this week:

The researchers coined the term “bloom patterns” to describe this new group of unfolding mechanisms that resemble flowers blooming.

“Bloom patterns have three main characteristics that make them unique,” said Wang, a BYU mechanical engineering major. “First, they can be folded flat. Second, they are deployable. Third, they expand like a flower blooming, rotating from a symmetric center.”

In terms of engineering applications, this means that large items that require compact size for storage could be manufactured via origami folds from a single large sheet of material, stored in its fully-folded form, and then either partially or completely “deployed” to become take on the desired final shape. Something like this could give a whole new spin to concepts like prefabricated architecture, for example. The researchers note that the rotational symmetry and somewhat circular shape of the deployed structures give these items more stability than similar structures created using other (non “bloom”) origami folding patterns.

Here’s a video from Brigham Youg explaining this origami and its engineering applications potential.

Hmm, I love the creativity of this mashup:

Origami . . . engineering.

Origami . . . engineering.

If you’d like to see the full article, published by Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Volume 481, Issue 2320 (Aug 2025), click here: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rspa.2025.0299

Highly recommended reading.

After all, you never know where the big ideas could come from. You know?

 

Posted in architecture, Art, Creativity, design | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Intersection of Beige and Cream

Because working on a computer for hours at a time (in a single sitting) is not good for anyone, I try to take short, frequent breaks to get in some stretching and walking as much as possible. Fortunately, my office is in the Grohmann Museum on the campus of Milwaukee School of Engineering, so not only do my walks get the blood moving and help to work out the kinks in general but they also give me a chance to surround myself with art along the way.

I know this isn’t exactly art.

 

But it was a fun thing to notice as I walked laps around the second floor in the very late afternoon one day last week. Just a very striking intersection of planes and angles—and as I am a fan of abstract, geometrical images, I naturally had to stop and take a picture.

The above image is a cropped close-up area of the picture I took. Isolating it from the larger context allowed me to approximate the moment of “intersection” that caught my eye.

Below is the entire photo. I’ve worked in this building since it opened in 2007. Not once in nearly 20 years have I noticed that specific little corner of the ceiling before. I’m not sure what drew my attention last week, but there must have been something unique in the quality of light and shadow created at that particular time from both inside and outside (sun) sources.

By the way, do you see the painting below the red “Exit” sign? It’s a Norman Rockwell, titled “The Bookworm.”  According to an Artnet News story, it sold in 2015 for $3,834,000, well above Sotheby’s presale estimated value of $1.5 to $2.5 million.

It’s quite astonishing to me, now that I take a moment to reflect on it, that a painting worth that much money could be part of my ordinary daily routine.

Posted in Art, Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

“The Art of Forgetting” – A short story, plus my start-to-finish ChatGPT creative conversation

This week’s short-short story, “The Art of Forgetting,” was fun to write.

An old man sits in a beige recliner in the spotlight on a shadowed stage beneath a large, framed image of the "Christ the Redeemer" sculpture in Rio de Janeiro

‘The Art of Forgetting’ – ChatGPT Image, prompted by Katherine Wikoff, Aug 19, 2025, 01_38_14 PM

Before I go any further, here are the relevant PDFs for this week’s post.

First, HERE is the PDF of my short story, “The Art of Forgetting.”

And HERE is my entire ChatGPT creative conversation. It’s long and meandering, but it may have some value if you’re interested in seeing how I wrote the story, at least the “trail” left behind by my “chat.”

Finally, HERE is chat I used in prompting ChatGPT to create the image that illustrates this post.

Like many of my short pieces, this short story began as a writing group exercise. The prompt derived from a line in “The Blind Pig” (‘The Blind Pig’ – A short story by Katherine Wikoff, with ChatGPT assists), the first short story I finished with ChatGPT. The specific line was this:

“quietly rotting memories”

My friend Karen had highlighted it as a phrase she especially liked during her critique of that story, so we decided to turn it around and build on it as the prompt for our next meeting’s exercise. It became the seed for my story’s main character, Edgar, and his frightening journey through grief.

If you look at the “Appendix Chat” I used to prompt this week’s story, you’ll see that ChatGPT suggested a number of story ideas based on the phrase “quietly rotting memories.” Almost none appealed to me—but something about the following description caught my eye and sparked my imagination:

“An elderly man pretends to have dementia to avoid his family, but his lies accidentally trigger real past events. Now he has to untangle his quietly rotting memories from the fake ones he invented.”

That logline emerged only after a lot of back-and-forth with ChatGPT. I asked for multiple lists of potential ideas, identified a few I liked, requested more, and gradually whittled them down—rinse and repeat—until the premise and character finally felt right. I remember feeling a little guilty about being “wishy-washy,” like I was wasting ChatGPT’s time by not settling on a direction. But that’s exactly one of the gifts of working with AI: you can keep iterating until something clicks. After rejecting plenty of false starts, I landed on a premise that truly spoke to me—and that made the project so much more fun.

Much of the initial drafting I don’t remember (it was two months ago), but I do recall realizing early on that this story could lean toward dark comedy. The subject matter (dementia) is scary and upsetting, and I could easily see myself slipping into pathos and melodrama, so the idea of approaching it with an edgy wit appealed to me. Plus, ChatGPT helped nudge me in that direction by suggesting Edgar’s family escalate his ruse by sending him to Shady Pines and tossing out his jazz collection. Those tiny details instantly gave me a sense of Edgar—his history, his quirks, the kind of man who’d cling to his records. Once the theater background started to surface, I embraced it as a source for motifs and perspectives.

In my last “Creative Practice” post, I mentioned that I had noticed my photography “style” emerge gradually over time, almost as a byproduct of taking photo after photo. The same seems to be happening in my writing with ChatGPT. Even though I’ve only produced a handful of pieces, the speed at which I can now write—much faster than I could without AI—has already revealed recurring rhythms and themes in my work. These might be the beginnings of a literary “voice.” I expect this will become even clearer in a couple of weeks, when I share my next original piece, a poem I’ve already finished called “The Museum of Mislaid Days.”

One thing I’ve begun to notice about my style is that I’m oddly drawn to morbid subject matter—by which I mean things that feel nostalgic, tragic, or unsettling—and to liminal spaces. I’ve sensed this in my photography, although there it manifests more in abstraction, geometry, detachment, and abandonment rather than “morbid” content. It’s a surprising realization (although, why?) to see these patterns emerging in my writing as well.

For example, I wrote a poem for a writing group exercise this past winter, “Common Comrades,” about a sculpture along the Milwaukee Riverwalk. I didn’t invent the horrifying subject matter—it was right there in front of me on Kilbourn Avenue at the river—but still it was that sculpture that spoke to me, not one of the many others installed along the Riverwalk. To put it in terms of the “intertextuality” I talked about in my last “Creative Practice” post, my poem entered into a dialogue with the “Common Comrades” sculpture. Both sculpture and poem now speak to each other, and the result is beautiful to me precisely because it is so sad and unsettling.

Edgar’s story for this week nearly went the same way. In draft after draft, he ended up completely lost to madness.

But then, just a few days ago, I asked myself: Why? Why does he need to be lost? My work so often seems to end on a “down” note—but it doesn’t have to. I could let Edgar find something lighter, even if somewhat ambiguous, at the end. So I did. Judge for yourself whether it works, but for me, giving Edgar a measure of hope felt right.

That, to me, is one of the fascinating things about creative practice—patterns emerge, sometimes in spite of ourselves. I don’t know what they “mean.” I’m not interested in psychoanalyzing it. What I do know is that creativity often feels like something flowing through me rather than from me.

When I’m walking down the street and something suddenly strikes me as a potential photograph, I don’t know where that impulse/recognition comes from. I don’t plan for it. That moment really does feel like the muse is announcing its presence. The same thing happens in writing. Even with my novel, where I’ve made deliberate choices about subject matter, once I begin drafting, characters and plot twists pop up and surprise me. It’s as if the stories are already out there, waiting, and my role—sometimes with AI’s help—is to act as the channel that brings them into shareable form.

This Week’s Suggested Creative Practice

Getting Acquainted with the Artist Your Creations Knew Before You Did

Each week in this (nascent) “Creative Practice in the Age of AI” series, I offer a short list of “creative invitations”—small exercises that I hope can be meaningfully adapted to your own work. This week’s invitations focus on self-discovery: not only noticing the recurring styles, subjects, and images that surface in your creative practice but also reflecting on what they reveal about the artist you are becoming.

1.  Trace Your Echoes – Pull out 3-5 recent works you’ve made (a photo, a paragraph, a sketch, a song draft). Jot down what imagery, tone, or subject matter repeats across them. What patterns surprise you? Which ones feel inevitable?

2.  The Morbid–Tender Sway – Write (or sketch/photograph) something in your usual style. Then rewrite/reframe it with the opposite emotional register. If you lean “dark,” give it a lighter, gentler ending (like Edgar’s) or add a comedic twist. If you lean “light,” twist it toward the uncanny or imbue it with tragedy, sadness, or despair.

3.  Memory Remix – Take a phrase or fragment from an older work—something that still resonates with you—and use it as a seed for a new piece. (Like what my writing group did with “quietly rotting memories.”) Notice how the original context colors the new one.

4.  AI as Trickster – Ask ChatGPT (or another AI) to generate five versions of a story premise, poem opening, or image idea based on one phrase you like. Circle the least appealing one and try making something from it anyway. (Constraints sometimes reveal surprising aspects of your style.)

5.  Your Liminal Self-Portrait – Create a short piece (poem, photo, drawing, even a journal entry) set in a “threshold” space—an airport lounge, a waiting room, a hallway. Then look at what kind of mood your work naturally drifts toward: anxious, whimsical, mournful, playful?

(Note: In addition to the denotative definition of “liminal” spaces as “transitional,” “threshold” spaces between one “state” and another, like that dreamy threshold between wakefulness and sleep, I am also interested in the connotative definition of “liminal” spaces as empty places intended to be occupied, except no one is there, and which when you experience, view, or read about them, you feel a sense of uneasiness. There is often something eerie or mournful or vaguely threatening about a “liminal” space.)

Thanks so much for joining me this week! I hope you enjoy “The Art of Forgetting” and the behind-the-scenes peek at its creation.

Posted in Creative Practice in the Age of AI, Creativity, fiction, generative AI, Writing with AI, Writing, blogging | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

I See What You Mean

Today’s post is something different for me. My friend Kathleen is editor of a newsletter that publishes fiction, poetry, and essays. Because her publication is limited to black-and-white reproduction of images, and the article below contains a color image, she asked if I would be willing to publish it on my website.

I would be happy to do this as a favor for my friend anyway, but it was a pleasant surprise to discover that the article fits in nicely with what I like to publish here, so it’s kind of a win–win–win all the way around, for Kathleen, for the author, and for me!

And so now, without further ado, please allow me to introduce Joe Burke and his intriguing exploration of unexpected dimensions behind a commonly used phrase.

 

 

“I See What You Mean”

by Joe Burke

Many of us have heard someone use that phase, and some of us may have used it ourselves.  It is an odd expression since it combines two different sensory functions of the body.  The phrase combines sight and the spoken words filtered through the intellect producing some degree of understanding.   But what does one really see? 

Recently I participated in a spiritual discussion about living in the LIGHT.  Having been a photographer my mind jumped to my definition of a photograph as an image that was painted by LIGHT.   And I am aware that this LIGHT is only the visual spectrum that our human eyes can SEE.  No infrared, nor ultraviolet, nor X-Rays are involved.  So, immediately, my mind says that living in the LIGHT, with the visual spectrum, could have limitations.    

The phrase, “I see what you mean” came to mind.  How much of the LIGHT am I really seeing in my life?   Communication demands a speaker and a listener. The words of the speaker may or may not have the same meaning for the listener.  Hence I give you this example from photography.  The same photograph could be “seen” in high contrast black and white, or possibly in black and white filled with grey tones, or possibly reproduced with all the colors available in the visual spectrum.

It may not be fair to assume that the listener “sees” a colorful statement if he/she is only looking at it with the eyes adapted for high contrast black and white.  Even the opposite is possible.  The speaker may be using high contrast black and white words and the listener tries to “see” it as a color image.                                

When a person says, “I see what you mean” do they see the same spectrum and the full meaning of all that the speaker was relating?  The conversation can become complicated.  I am not sure it can be resolved without each party double checking with each other.

Suppose we add grey tones to the “seeing”.  The conversation becomes deeper and picks up more nuances’.   More understanding is required, more facts must be communicated.  More information is being passed, so more concentration is demanded on both sides.  The speaker realizes that his/her message is more important and must use words to indicate that, and the listener must adjust his/her hearing to adapt.

In some cases a whole new meaning is being communicated.  Where there was nothing, now there is something.  And that something has to be part of the conversation.  Both parties have so much more to work with.  But if one party is giving this much information, the other party cannot be on the high contrast black and white level.  Much more is demanded of the communicator and so much more from the listener or meaningful communication cannot happen.

For the final step in our experiment what happens when the speaker is using the full color spectrum?  Oh my, we are now in full conversation where both the speaker is communicating precisely his/her message and the listener must now open up completely in order to “see” what is being presented.

Can the speaker find the words necessary to relay his/her full message, and can the listener absorb all the color tones that are being sent to him/her?  When the listener now says, “I see what you mean” both parties are responsible to double check each other if the conversation is to continue on the same level.  Living in the LIGHT is not a simple task.

I hope you can “see what I mean”

P.S.  Remember, this example only relates to the visual spectrum here. 

NOTE — If you would like to see this article in its original format, please click on the title here ‘I See What You Mean’ – by Joe Burke  to open a PDF of the original Word document.

Photo of the author, Joe Burke

Contributor’s note

I was a medical photographer in Richmond VA., supplying the medical staff with visuals for their lectures, publications, and books. I photographed patients before, during and after operations. I was in the operating room, in the morgue, and behind the microscope gathering my photos and then processing and printing them for the doctors. I also taught them how to take better and more accurate photographs for their research.

In my retirement I use the computer to adjust or repair old and new photographs. And because I read a lot of progressive theology I create photos like the one attached [below].

My wife and I live in a retirement community in Milwaukee, WI. At 84 we are still active and curious about life.

A FINAL WORD FROM ME — Thank you, Joe, for sharing your article with my readers!

Posted in Art, Creativity, Nature, Photography | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment