Double Take

I don’t think my grocery store understands how sales are supposed to work 😂

Posted in Life, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

My election commentary on Swedish public television news

Because I teach political science at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), I was tapped us someone to interview this morning in connection with yesterday’s Presidential election in the U.S. I tag-teamed with one of my colleagues, Dr. Jeremy Kedziora, which made the experience a lot more fun and a lot less scary (LIVE TV!!!).

Although this interview was a live appearance, you can slide back the timeline on the video to watch a particular spot. My part begins at 1:08:48. I don’t know how long it will stay up, but I wanted to share.

Here’s the link: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/senaste-nytt-om-valet-i-usa

Be sure to “accepter alles” on the cookies prompt.

UPDATE: Now that the broadcast is over, the “live feed” clip also appears to have disappeared. However, I was watching the show in my office first thing this morning to get a feel for what was happening in this broadcast before I went upstairs to the roof garden atop my building (the Grohmann Museum) for my 15 minutes of fame, and I discovered this afternoon that I had left my original tab open when I paused the feed to go get interviewed. The video was still there on that unrefreshed page, so I was able to play it after all and do a screen recording of our interview. I uploaded that 12-minute clip to my YouTube channel so I could share it with my family and colleagues, and I labeled it as “unlisted,” meaning it’s not exactly public but not completely private, either. If you have the link you can find it.

Here it is 🙂  (The audio goes out at the very end, so whatever BRILLIANT things I was saying at that point are lost forever, LOL)

Posted in Political Analysis | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

More ChatGPT practice in my writing group exercises

The arrival of generative AI is bringing lots of changes to my job as a college professor. I teach some humanities and social science courses (film and media studies, political science, digital society, etc.), but I also teach quite a few courses that are centered around writing and editing (for example, composition, technical communication, presentations, writing for digital media, digital storytelling).

I can envision positive uses for generative AI in all of them. Students want to learn how to use this tool well, and more and more I have come to believe that my job as a teacher is to help them do that. Even as a writing teacher, I am bringing generative AI practice into the classroom as much as possible.

The future of writing instruction, in fact, will likely become far more about helping students develop discernment (to know whether a text is “good” in terms of aesthetics, form, content, and functionality) and advanced editing skills (the reshaping, molding, enhancing, and crafting of a text using multiple inputs) than it will be about having them generate words on the page in the first place. Even before ChatGPT, most writing teachers saw generation of text as merely the starting point, the rough draft. Sadly, students sometimes think they’re done at the rough draft stage, like they’ve exhausted the subject, and they find it extremely difficult to “revise” in any significant ways. Our job as teachers is to help them push past that and tackle the hard work of seriously redeveloping the draft into something more substantial, more refined (down to the essentials), more audience focused, more aligned with its purpose and intended function.

The best way for me to learn almost anything is to dive right in, get messy, put in lots of practice hours. And that’s what I’m doing with generative AI. Only by using it myself can I understand what the tool can and can’t do.

Which brings me to my writing group exercises. If you follow my blog, you already know that my writing group does short exercises to share each time we meet. We take turns coming up with prompts, and then all of us do our own responses to share when we get together. Several weeks ago as I was using ChatGPT to do some research for an academic project on a Friday afternoon, I got the idea to try prompting the generative AI to produce my writing group response. I’ve done it a couple more times since then and have been impressed with the results so far. Just for fun, in the immediate future anyway, I’m going to try using ChatGPT not only to craft my writing group responses but also to respond to each prompt in a way that utilizes the serendipity of “fate” (in the form of that prompt) to move my novel forward.

Logically, this is where I would tell you about my novel. But my novel is difficult to explain, far too complicated and confusing. Hopefully once it’s finished I can just as ChatGPT to produce a nice logline for me 🙂  I know my characters and the overall structure, but the novel has three main story arcs that, while thematically related, are quite separated from each other temporally and only minimally connected by geography and certain specific plot incidents. Suffice it to say that much of the action is set in the fictional Ohio River town of Adell Ferry. Part of the story happens in the 1930s, part of it happens in the early/mid-1970s, and part of it happens today. 

“Today” being somewhat fluid and indeterminate, as I started writing this novel literally almost thirty years ago, LOL. I’ve had to change out the technology a lot since I started (e.g., pay phones?) and long ago realized I’d better try to deemphasize the specifics of anything tech related as much as possible to avoid dating it too terribly.

Today’s writing group exercise is aimed at the 1930s section of the novel. I hope it’s not overkill, but I thought I’d show you all the various drafts (three in all) that ChatGPT came up with. Each draft has good things, but I liked the last one best. Probably what I’ll do is keep it as the foundation and then pull out additional items that I liked from the other drafts to insert throughout the text wherever they seem to fit.

Also, you may note that ChatGPT ignored some of the instructions I gave it, maybe because it couldn’t easily find any text out there online to scrape, so I’ll need to write up those parts myself if I want them in there. I’m showing all three drafts so you can also see the good parts as well as the clichés.

But the main thing I want to emphasize is that the final ChatGPT draft—which, again, is my favorite of the three—will not be MY final draft. My own final draft will incorporate not only bits of the other two ChatGPT attempts but also my own original text. 

So here it is. First, of course, the usual disclaimer: This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of the author’s imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.

And now, my exercise. I’ve included little markers to indicate my prompts and ChatGPT’s responses. 

Oh wait, I almost forgot! The prompt for this week’s writing group exercise was “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.”

1)  My initial prompt:

Write a scene for a novel.

A big part of the scene is background information, woven together with Addy walking along a lightly wooded area on the bank of the Ohio River in summer 1936. Addy’s father became sick with a cough and progressive weakness and wasting. The farm became too much for him, plus the Depression is making farming difficult. He had always wanted adventure but got married, had Addy, took over his father’s farm. But now that he’s so sick, and it’s the Depression (it is summer of 1936), he wants adventure at last. Addy’s family is living on a shantyboat, has been for a couple of years. They stay up and down the Ohio River in summer, then move south along the Mississippi during winter. Addy’s schooling has been spotty, as a result. 

Write that first background scene framed by Addy, age 16, walking along the riverbank just south of a small town on the Ohio side of the Ohio River called Adell Ferry. She has been feeding their chickens on the riverbank. Her father picked it because its name was so similar to Addy’s (full name Adele). He didn’t realize the town’s name was pronounced ADD-uhl, like someone’s brains were “addled.” It’s a nice town and Addy has met some girls at the drugstore, where they were sitting at the soda fountain counter giggling over movie star magazines. Addy would like to stay and do her senior year of high school here.

Some background to show in flashback entries to this scene:

Many people who live on shantyboats are shifty, criminal. They steal. Addy’s father has always taken pains to introduce himself to the people whose homes are near where the family docks, to impress upon them that he and his family are upright citizens fallen on hard times and ill health.

Addy’s family keeps chickens. They are in cages on the shantyboat during the night but forage on the riverbank during the day

Include details of river life and shantyboat living in particular. Also mention the attitudes of townspeople toward shantyboat dwellers. Mention that the strip of land near the river was often considered “extra” for the farmers because they knew shantyboat people would steal it. Almost like an agreed upon deal that shantyboat people would harvest crops near the water.

Addy has been spending lots of time at the library in town. She can’t get a library card (no address) but the librarian has been kind. Addy stays in the library for hours several days a week. She reads in a small room at the back of the building filled with local reference materials. Small room but high ceilings and lots of light. High ceilings help with the heat. And the building is made of local limestone, so it retains the nighttime cool temperatures inside throughout the morning.

Addy has been reading A Tale of Two Cities. The librarian told her a secret place in the quiet, small local references room where she can hide the book and then pick it up again the next day.

Highlight Addy’s thoughts throughout this chapter scene about the first line in that novel. “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.” In some ways, she realizes, this is true of her own life right now. Her father is happy but dying. Their family (father, mother, her) are closer than ever, but they are alone, cut off from all their relatives. With the exception of some kind people like the librarian, they are also viewed with suspicion and dislike because they are river rats. Addy has met many, many people and seen many wondrous things in the adventure of the last few years living on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers, but she has no friends and is stuck on the water.

ChatGPT said:

Addy knelt in the shade of a thick-limbed maple, crumbling a handful of breadcrumbs between her fingers, scattering the crumbs for the chickens scratching and pecking at the brush along the riverbank. Their soft clucking, punctuated by the occasional squawk of a hungry hen, floated on the breeze, mingling with the lazy lap of the Ohio River. Summer hung in the air, thick and hot, and Addy could feel the damp warmth clinging to her as she straightened up, brushing dirt from her dress.

Adell Ferry, the name of the small town nearby, had amused her father. “Almost your name,” he’d said, his voice thin but bright with mischief as he’d explained it. “Adele and Adell—seems like it was meant for us.” Addy smiled faintly, though the irony was bittersweet. Her father hadn’t known the locals said it like “addled,” as if their minds had gone soft. She’d overheard the kids in town laughing at her family, calling them “river rats,” and it stung. Still, her father had insisted on pulling up their shantyboat here, calling it a good place to rest. A nice town with good people, he’d said. And sometimes, Addy believed him.

For the past few days, she’d taken to wandering up here on her own, after chores, after feeding the chickens. The river stretched out in both directions, as familiar to her as the scratchy wool blanket she’d had since she was a little girl. It was her home—at least, it had been for a while now. They’d been living on the water since her father took ill. A cough, a stubborn one, that had started slow but grown worse, until every breath sounded like it might tear him apart. Farming became too much for him, and when they couldn’t keep up, he sold the land. Then they built the shantyboat, and here they were, drifting with the seasons and the rivers.

Up and down the Ohio in the summer, south along the Mississippi in the winter. That was their pattern. Their chickens—her father’s pride, and, for her mother, a lifeline—were tethered to their own small cages each night, and she’d gotten used to the river mud and stray feathers that marked her days. It wasn’t the life she imagined, but she had seen things in these years on the river—sunsets that set the sky afire, islands where no one lived but deer and wild foxes, towns like Adell Ferry where life stopped every evening for pie and talk at the soda fountain.

Adell Ferry was quaint, full of friendly faces and busybodies, both of whom turned suspicious whenever a shantyboat came near. People like her father did their best to ease folks’ fears—he’d make a point to introduce himself wherever they moored, showing the neighbors they meant no harm. Most folks had grown up with shantyboats coming and going, the river a lifeline in hard times, though the Depression made it feel more crowded, the edges of the riverbanks lined with makeshift homes.

Despite her father’s coughing fits, despite her mother’s furrowed brows, this little town had something to offer Addy that felt close to hope: school. She’d gone inside the local high school once when she stopped by the library, imagining herself slipping into one of those desks, a real senior with real classes. The idea of finishing high school was thrilling, almost as thrilling as her afternoons in the limestone library, the building that felt cool and quiet and steady, like a fortress against the summer heat.

The library had become her safe haven, especially the tiny room at the back where the local history books were kept. The librarian, a kind woman with a soft voice and sharp eyes, knew Addy couldn’t check out books without an address, but she didn’t seem to mind when Addy lingered for hours, pouring over any book she could find. She was deep into A Tale of Two Cities now, keeping her place tucked away in a hidden nook the librarian had showed her.

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,” Addy murmured as she walked along the river’s edge, the opening line playing over in her mind. She’d read it dozens of times, and each time it felt heavier, deeper. It made sense to her. Her life felt split, just like that book. On one hand, she had her family, closer than they’d ever been, bonded by the water and their strange existence on a drifting house. On the other, she was alone, cut off from a future that seemed to drift farther out of reach with each passing mile down the river.

She thought of the girls she’d met at the soda fountain, crowded around a glossy magazine, giggling over some movie star or other, looking up only to smile politely at her. They were nice enough but clearly bewildered by her life, this “river rat” who knew the water better than the roads, whose family carried everything they owned on a shantyboat tethered to the land with nothing but hopes and a few chickens.

The river could feel like a prison sometimes, its endless roll hemming her in, keeping her separate from the ordinary lives of others. But her father—he was happy here, that was plain enough. She could see it in his face, in the way he seemed lighter somehow, despite the illness eating away at him. It was a chance at the adventure he’d never had, the one he’d traded away to raise a family and work the land. Now that life was nearly gone, he was finally doing what he’d always dreamed of, floating free and wild on the river.

Her family had seen so many wonders, but Addy wanted something else now. Not the endless journey, not the constant moving, but a place to settle, a chance to stay in one town long enough to make a friend, to finish high school, to know what it felt like to belong.

 

2)  I said:

Change the voice slightly. Don’t use words like “quaint.” Don’t use cliches to describe the small towns. Add in more details of Addy’s current activity. Talk about the sun on her face, the breeze off the wide, brown river. Talk about her favorite reddish brown chicken and its curious personality. Maybe add a conversational exchange with her mother about a missing chicken and the fact that Addy will be walking into town to the library soon.

ChatGPT said:

Addy squinted against the sun, shading her eyes with one hand as she watched the chickens scramble along the bank, their feathers ruffled up against the breeze blowing off the wide, brown river. The sunlight poured down, hot and steady, soaking into her skin, and she let herself feel it, standing there on the river’s edge, just south of the town with the funny name. Adell Ferry—close to her own, almost like her father had meant for them to end up here. Except he hadn’t known the locals pronounced it “Add-uhl,” like their brains were addled. The first time she’d heard it, Addy had nearly laughed, imagining her name as something strange and broken, the kind of word a mother might say with a frown.

But her father had wanted to stay, and she supposed she couldn’t blame him. There was something gentle here, in the way the river curved slowly past, in the sounds of the breeze and distant bird calls, in the low hum of insects that filled up the gaps between her thoughts.

She tossed another handful of crumbs onto the ground, watching her favorite hen—reddish brown with bright, alert eyes—pecking her way around the other chickens, strutting as if she owned the place. “You think you’re special, don’t you, Rosie?” Addy murmured, watching the hen dart forward, always a step quicker, always curious enough to dig under leaves and branches the other hens ignored. Rosie was a quick one, too, always seeming to sense when Addy was near and ready to steal scraps right from her hand. Addy could spend half an hour watching her scratch and flutter, her way of making a whole event out of a little crumb.

“Addy!” Her mother’s voice floated from the shantyboat a few yards off. It was patched with old boards, speckled with faded paint, the only home they’d known these last few years. “Addy, have you seen Nellie?”

Addy looked around, scanning the edge of the riverbank. “Probably hiding in the trees again, Ma. I’ll find her before I head into town.”

“Well, don’t leave without her! Can’t afford to lose another hen to a hawk.”

Addy gave a quick nod, making a mental note to keep her eyes open. They’d lost one chicken already the previous month, and with each one that went missing, her mother’s expression grew darker, her lips pressed thin. It was too easy to lose things when you lived on the water, where every day meant tying and untying, drifting away or finding your footing all over again. It seemed like every part of their lives was precarious, from the chickens to the makeshift garden her mother kept in old crates on deck.

With a final handful of crumbs scattered for Rosie and the others, Addy wiped her hands on her dress and took in the scene around her. The air was thick with summer warmth, the river’s scent—a mix of wet earth and waterlogged wood—seeming to rise up to meet her. Somewhere in the trees, cicadas droned on in waves, their sound mixing with the creak of the boat shifting in the breeze.

Today, she’d walk the half-mile stretch to town for a couple hours at the library. The thought made her smile a little. The librarian never asked too many questions about her, though she’d kindly offered a chair in the quiet, high-ceilinged room at the back, and even a place to tuck away her book, a thick, worn copy of A Tale of Two Cities. Addy had memorized that first line, reading it over and over. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.

Addy thought about that line a lot as she walked along the river, her thoughts filled with the strange truth of it. Here was her family, closer than they’d ever been. But they were alone, cut off from everyone they’d known before the river. Her father, with his rough cough and the tired lines carved into his face, seemed almost lighter here, as if the water had given him some of his youth back. He’d wanted to drift, always talked about floating on the river like Huck Finn, even though he’d tied himself to a farm and a family instead. Now, even sick as he was, he seemed happy, looking out from their boat with something close to pride.

Addy wasn’t sure what she wanted. She’d met a few girls in town, their laughter bright as they huddled around a magazine at the soda fountain, whispering about movie stars and what dress they’d wear to the homecoming dance. She’d felt like an outsider, watching them, but they’d smiled, and a few of them had even waved her over to sit with them. Sitting at that counter, with the clang of dishes and the smell of syrup and coffee, Addy had felt an ache she couldn’t quite put words to.

Maybe, she thought, brushing her hair back as the wind picked up, it was the ache of wanting more than just a good view of the water, or the chance to see another new town when winter came and they headed south again. She wanted a place she could be known, maybe even finish her last year of high school. But those were big dreams, dreams that felt weightless in the heat of the afternoon. For now, she’d go find Nellie, then set her sights on the cool, quiet library waiting up the road.

 

3)  I said:

This is great. keep everything pretty much the same, but add in a bit more reflection on the best of times and the worst of times tension and ambivalence in Addy’s life. Emphasize the fact that she’ll turn 17 in a few weeks. She’s starting to think about her own future and how that will take her away from her parents and then they’ll be alone and she’ll be alone. But it can’t be helped. She has to find her place in the world, and it for sure isn’t living on the river like a hobo

ChatGPT said:

Addy squinted against the sun, shading her eyes with one hand as she watched the chickens scramble along the bank, their feathers ruffling up against the warm breeze rolling off the wide, brown river. She straightened up, feeling the sun settle heavy on her shoulders, its heat sinking into her skin as she dusted breadcrumbs off her fingers. She let herself stand still for a moment, breathing in the smell of river mud and sun-dried grasses.

In a few weeks, she’d be seventeen. The thought felt strange, stretching through her like an itch she couldn’t quite scratch. Seventeen should mean something, didn’t it? But here she was, floating from town to town on the water, her whole life tied to a makeshift boat and the banks of the Ohio River. Turning seventeen on a shantyboat wasn’t exactly what she’d imagined for herself.

Across the bank, Rosie, her favorite hen, strutted with her usual cocky little bounce, pecking the dirt with quick, sharp motions, already snatching up crumbs before the other hens even noticed. Rosie was a bossy, curious little thing. She was bold enough to eat straight from Addy’s hand, smart enough to figure out where the food was hidden, and a good bit faster than the rest of the flock. Addy grinned, watching her scratch around, tilting her head up at Addy as if expecting to be admired.

“Addy!” Her mother’s voice floated from the shantyboat, which sat bobbing gently a few yards off. Addy glanced over, taking in its patched boards and weather-worn sides, the battered little home her father had patched together for them, now their lifeline and their whole world.

“Yeah, Ma?” Addy called back.

“Have you seen Nellie? I don’t see her with the others.”

Addy scanned the riverbank, looking for any sign of the little gray hen. “She’s probably hiding in the trees again. I’ll find her before I go into town,” she called, hoping that would soothe her mother’s worry.

“Well, don’t leave without her! We can’t afford to lose another to a hawk.”

“I know, Ma,” Addy replied, though she felt a pang of frustration under her words. They’d lost a hen already, and she knew how much each loss stung her mother. But to Addy, it felt like just one more reminder of how fragile everything was. It seemed like they were always losing things—hens, bits of the boat, pieces of themselves—as if the river claimed a toll just for letting them stay.

With a final handful of crumbs tossed for Rosie and the others, Addy brushed her hands off on her skirt and took in the scene around her. The air was thick with summer heat, the river’s scent—a mix of wet soil and waterlogged wood—settling over her like a fog. Somewhere in the trees, cicadas buzzed in waves, their droning chorus filling the air, mixing with the low groan of their boat shifting with the current.

She knew she’d be heading to the library soon. There was something steady and cool in that limestone building, with its thick walls and high ceilings that trapped the morning’s chill. She loved the little reading room the librarian had shown her, the one filled with dusty history books, and that spot behind the shelf where she hid her novel. She was halfway through A Tale of Two Cities, reading it in stolen moments, pages at a time. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. That line had caught her right away, and the more she read, the more it seemed to dig into her.

Best of times, worst of times—that was her life all right, all those opposites tangled up and pulling at her. Here she was, with her family closer than ever, practically living on top of one another, bound by sickness and hard times, by the river and the towns that watched them with wary eyes. She loved them, and they loved her—she knew that as sure as anything. And yet, in less than a month, she’d be seventeen, and she felt something hard and restless growing inside her, something that made her stomach twist when she thought about staying on this shantyboat forever.

Her father seemed happy enough here, as though this life was the adventure he’d never quite gotten to have. She saw it sometimes in the way he looked out over the water, coughing but content, with that dreamy look of his, as if he were floating beyond the river itself. Her mother…well, Addy could tell her mother wasn’t thrilled about the river life. But she’d stayed for him, for all of them, and made the shantyboat into some kind of home.

Addy loved her parents, but she couldn’t imagine herself here a year from now, or even six months. She didn’t want to turn seventeen with her whole future drifting in circles on the river, living like a hobo, mooring near towns that kept their distance or looked down on her. She wanted a place that was hers, a chance to finish school, to make something of herself that was more than just the “river rat” everyone saw.

The ache of it hit her hard sometimes, especially after a day like yesterday, sitting at the soda fountain with the girls in town. They’d smiled, welcomed her, even laughed at some of her jokes, but she could feel it—the strangeness in the way they watched her, their half-hidden glances at her patched clothes, her river-weathered hands. They’d been polite, but they didn’t know her. They’d never understand what it was like to sleep on a floating floor, to wake up wondering if the river might carry you away one night if you didn’t tie your rope tight enough.

She couldn’t be sure where she belonged, but she was starting to know for certain where she didn’t. And in the quiet hours when she sat reading, letting herself get lost in A Tale of Two Cities, she felt the pull of it even stronger. She knew the risk—leaving her parents behind, knowing they’d be alone, just the two of them and the chickens, drifting through the seasons without her. And she’d be alone, too, starting out somewhere new without her family to fall back on. It wasn’t a thought that sat easy in her chest.

But it couldn’t be helped. She had to find her place in the world, and it wasn’t on the river. That was just the way of things, she thought, glancing down at Rosie pecking her way through the underbrush. Every creature eventually left the nest—or, in her case, the shantyboat—and when her time came, she’d go, because that was what seventeen meant. She’d find Nellie soon, get herself into town, and let the pages of her book carry her to some other life, just for a little while.

A FINAL NOTE: I got tears in my eyes when I read this last paragraph at writing group. ChatGPT came up with the “leaving the nest” connection with the chickens, and I loved it. Plus the phrasing of  that whole sentence, including “when her time came, she’d go, because that was what seventeen meant.” I mean, just beautiful, right?

Posted in Creativity, Higher education, Teaching, Technology, WPLongform (posts of 1000 words or longer), writing exercises, Writing, blogging | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

What I’m Reading: A podcast/newsletter called “What Happens Next”

A podcast that I don’t even remember subscribing to but which I really enjoy for its unusual topics and insights on political and economic topics is titled, “What Happens Next in 6 Minutes with Larry Bernstein.”

In reading through the transcript of today’s episode, “White vs. Black Working Class Voters,” I suddenly realized that this podcast would be a great thing to share with you, especially if you’re also interested in these general topic areas. Serendipity brings so many odd things into my life, and whatever “sticks” is usually stuff that’s quirky, relevant, and smart.

Example: The first time I forwarded links from this podcast to someone was last December, a two-part “conspiracy theory” episode titled:

  1. Who Killed JFK?
  2. The JFK Assassination Conspiracy: Part 2

You think you know who killed JFK? You think you’ve exhausted all the conspiracy-theory books, articles, movies, etc.? Well, let me tell you, you listen to these podcast episodes (or read the transcripts, like me 🙂 ), and you’ll learn something you didn’t already know, I guarantee. There’s LOTS of new information and insight in these episodes, which surprised me. I don’t know how “relevant” it was, other than to make you wonder if maybe the conspiracy theory nut jobs are right, but it was definitely quirky and smart. 

The current “What Happens Next” episode was particularly interesting to me in light of our upcoming Presidential election: “White vs. Black Working Class Voters.”

There are different approaches to studying political science. My own preferred ways of understanding political behavior are at odds with the quantitative modeling, data-driven, statistical analysis approach that it seems many in the field of political science favor. I’m interested in systems, especially in the ways in which things not easily turned into “data” can have an outsized influence on political, economic, and social behavior, often transferring over into seemingly unrelated areas. I’m a dot connector; that is, I read and observe widely, I take note of arcane details, and then I begin fitting these pieces of the jigsaw puzzle together to get an idea of the big picture.

The guests on this podcast episode both have an approach that’s more similar to mine, focusing on interviews and ethnographic observations rather than statistical analysis. I’m not quite of the “three kinds of lies” school (“lies, damned lies, and statistics,” as per Mark Twain and Harry S. Truman), but I do think our society places far too much faith in “statistics,” especially when the more you learn about statistical analysis (how was the study designed, how was the data collected, how clean is the data, what model did you choose to run the analysis and why, etc.), the more you realize how “unfixed” the supposed certainty of statistics actually is.

Only in writing my blog post just now did I realize all this (the prevailing trends of political science versus who I am and why I feel like such an outsider). I must say, it’s satisfying to understand myself a little more clearly and to put my finger on exactly why I liked today’s podcast episode so much.

Long story short, I don’t know what’s going to happen next Tuesday. I have an idea, but I’m happy to wait and see how right (or wrong!) I am. No matter how the election is decided, I think we’ll all be okay and are probably far more in sync with each other than the media would have us believe. Voter behavior is driven by far more complex factors than the surface-level “issues” given primary importance status by mainstream media and social media algorithms.

If you agree, then you may also enjoy either checking out this specific “White vs. Black Working Class Voters” episode or exploring the entire “What Happens Next” archive. 

Posted in Learning, Life, News, Political Analysis, Popular culture | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Quiet Nook

Our MSOE library has a section that’s built out at a diagonal to the rest of the building. Imagine a square inserted over and through one corner of a rectangle, and you would pretty much have a blueprint of the layout. This little quiet spot is an odd, leftover bit of space between the top of the stairs and the elevator in the third floor landing area leading to the classroom hallway on one side and the bridge to the Science Building on the other. Perfect place to hang out between classes for anyone who’s happy with a single chair and a window view overlooking the mall below. (Like me, for instance😀)

Posted in Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

How ChatGPT helped me with my writing group exercises

My writing group does short exercises each week, and about three years ago I started sharing them (the prompt and my exercise in response) here in my blog. I don’t think I’ve shared an exercise in a while, but I tried something new last time we met, and I thought I’d share it with you.

So you know how I just submitted that abstract proposing an article about the ways that agricultural policy of the Cold War era shaped the Midwest? Well, on the Friday afternoon before our last writing group meeting two weeks ago, I had ChatGPT open because I had been using it that day to generate lists of potential sources. Similar to using Google for a search but far more more focused, with much more relevant results (except when they were “hallucinations,” of course). Then, as the work day was wrapping up, I remembered I had some writing exercises to do for our writing group meeting the next morning, a series of four prompts, and I thought: why not see what ChatGPT can do with it?

The prompts were as follows:

  1. a mystery puzzle
  2. waiting
  3. the worst day of your life
  4. I need you in the kitchen NOW

I actually had forgotten about number 4, but because my finished exercise coincidentally ended up having a kitchen in it, I guess it worked out okay after all. I created a prompt asking ChatGPT to write a short story incorporating all those elements, and I was decently impressed with what it delivered. There are definitely problems, but the basic essence of the story, the pacing, the portrayal of the characters, etc., seemed like something I could build from and maybe craft a decent larger story out of.

So, first the usual disclaimer. This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of the author’s imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.

And now my exercise.

First my prompt to ChatGPT:

Write a short story, set in 1973 in a rural Ohio River town, in which a 13-year-old girl is working on a mystery puzzle, given to her by her late grandmother, while waiting for her Vietnam War vet uncle to arrive to live with her and her parents. The parents have been fighting. The uncle is the mother’s brother, and she (the mother) says she owes her little brother a home after what he’s been through. The father is an angry sort, running the family business (a funeral home) which has been struggling financially. Another mouth to feed and a complication is all he anticipates the Vietnam War vet bringing to the family. In this story, emphasize the themes of waiting, the mystery puzzle, and the fact that this day is going to be the worst day in the 13-year-old girl’s life. The girl’s name is Abby, the mother’s name is Linda, the father’s name is Bill, and the Vietnam War vet is Gary.

Then, ChatGPT delivered this draft.

As I said before, it definitely has issues and needs editing-slash-redrafting. And yet there was something I recognized as “mine,” if that doesn’t sound too out there. I didn’t exactly write this, and yet I can also see my own writing in there, like a ghostly layer floating through the generative AI text. I can see what to keep, what to change, etc., but something essential is already here that I recognize as a good foundation for me to build on and maybe write something longer, more substantial than.

So here it is.

*    *    *

Abby sat at the worn kitchen table, fingers tracing the faded edges of the puzzle pieces scattered before her. The box had once been bright, but now it was dull, the image on the front barely recognizable. It was the puzzle her grandmother had left her, the one Abby had never gotten around to starting until now, months after the funeral. Grandma had called it a “mystery puzzle,” something to be solved without a guide. Abby had never been sure what that meant, but today, with everything looming, it felt like a distraction she desperately needed.

Outside, the late summer sun hung low, casting long shadows over the Ohio River. The wind smelled of soil and decay, the scent of the riverbanks. The town felt sleepy, its rhythm slowing to match the lethargy of the warm evening. Abby could hear her parents’ muffled voices in the next room—another argument, quieter this time, but still there, like the dull throb of a headache.

She picked up a piece of the puzzle, studying it carefully. It was part of a house, she thought. Or maybe it was a tree. The pieces never quite fit together the way they should. They were all jagged edges and odd shapes, just like everything else in her life lately.

Her mother had been crying earlier, quietly so Abby wouldn’t hear. But she’d heard. She always heard. Linda had been on the phone with Aunt Jean, whispering about Uncle Gary, her little brother who was finally coming home today. “I owe him this,” she had said, her voice trembling. “After what he’s been through… I owe him a home.”

Abby had never met Uncle Gary. He was just a story, a photograph in her mother’s dresser drawer of a young man in uniform, a smile on his face that didn’t quite reach his eyes. He’d gone to Vietnam when Abby was just a toddler and had been gone ever since. Now, after years of silence, he was coming to live with them.

Bill, her father, wasn’t happy. “We can’t afford another mouth to feed, Linda,” he had snapped that morning as Abby poured her cereal, trying not to look at either of them. The family funeral home was struggling, barely keeping the lights on. Death hadn’t been a booming business lately, as ironic as that was. Another person in the house meant more bills, more stress, more of everything Bill already couldn’t stand.

Abby sighed and pushed another piece into place. It didn’t fit. The whole puzzle felt impossible, and she wondered if it was even solvable at all, or if Grandma had just left her with something broken. Like the way her parents felt broken lately, like her family was about to fall apart entirely.

There was a slam in the other room, her father’s heavy footsteps retreating down the hall, followed by the front door creaking open and closed. He was gone, off to the funeral home for another late shift. Abby was glad he’d left. She couldn’t handle the tension anymore.

She looked at the clock. Uncle Gary should have been here by now. Her mother had said around 5, but it was past 6. The waiting made her stomach churn, like the way she felt before a storm. She didn’t know why, but she was afraid of meeting him. Something about the way her mother’s voice softened when she spoke about him, the way she said, “After what he’s been through…” made Abby imagine dark, twisted things. She didn’t know much about the war, only what she’d heard on the news, and none of it was good.

Her mother appeared in the doorway, pale and anxious, her eyes red-rimmed from crying. “Abby, sweetheart,” she said softly, “Gary’s on his way. I’m going to go wait outside for him, okay?”

“Okay,” Abby said, her voice barely above a whisper. Linda gave her a tight smile and stepped out onto the porch, the screen door slapping shut behind her.

Abby pushed another puzzle piece into place. This one seemed to fit, though she wasn’t sure it was right. She leaned back, staring at the half-finished puzzle. Something about it was starting to make sense, but it was still a mess—just like everything else.

A car engine rumbled in the distance. Abby’s heart skipped. She stood up and crossed to the window, peeking out between the curtains. A beat-up truck pulled into the driveway, the engine sputtering as it came to a stop. Her mother stood on the porch, arms wrapped around herself, waiting.

The door of the truck opened, and out stepped a man. He was thin, too thin, his face gaunt and hollow. His hair was longer than Abby had expected, and his eyes—dark and empty—were nothing like the photograph in her mother’s drawer. Uncle Gary looked like a ghost, like someone who had seen too much and had nothing left.

Her mother rushed to him, throwing her arms around him, but Gary didn’t move. He stood stiff, letting her hug him without returning the gesture. Abby’s stomach twisted again. She had the sudden, terrifying feeling that everything was about to change forever.

She turned away from the window, feeling sick. The puzzle on the table seemed mocking now, its pieces scattered and unsolvable. Her grandmother had called it a mystery, but Abby wasn’t sure she wanted to know the answer anymore. The day stretched out ahead of her, heavy and oppressive, like the storm that was about to break.

Today was going to be the worst day of her life. She just didn’t know it yet.

Hans-Peter Gauster sloppyperfectionist, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Posted in Creativity, Learning, Technology, writing exercises, Writing, blogging | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Abstract for an article I just proposed

Remember how on Monday (when I posted my photo of gorgeously orange carrots and vibrantly green parsley) I mentioned that I was having a stressful day because I was trying to meet a deadline? Well, I made it—but not till almost 10:00 PM last night.

The abstract I submitted was an article proposal for the Middle West Review‘s special symposium “exploring the various dimensions of the Cold War era Midwest.” (Link to Call for Proposals HERE.) Although I was satisfied with the proposal itself by early afternoon yesterday, unfortunately when I went to submit, I noticed for the first time a few extra words in the last paragraph: “300-word proposals along with a vita [emphasis mine] should be sent to . . .”

YIKES!!!

For non-academics, a “vita” is a curriculum vitae, aka a “CV”or “vita.” It is like a resume on steroids. Into this epic document goes like EVERYTHING you’ve EVER done professionally. Classes you’ve taught, committees you’ve served on, papers presented, articles published, honors and awards—just everything!

I don’t exactly have one. Strike that. Until shortly before 10 PM last night I didn’t have one. Now I do.

I started my job at Milwaukee School of Engineering in 1996. I haven’t been on the job market since then. I love teaching there and have no plans to leave. For a long time I kept up my CV just because it was something you were supposed to do. But, you know . . . life? I had two kids, two dogs, a husband, and an old house. It all adds up. And MSOE is a teaching-focused university. I teach a 4/4 load, meaning four classes in fall semester and four classes in spring. In contrast, professors at R1 or R2 universities (“research” level 1, “research” level 2) have workloads centered more around doing research and publishing/presenting than teaching. They teach a 2/2 load, more or less, and the rest of their work lives go to research and service (serving on committees, for example). Professors at those kinds of schools truly need a vita. I, on the other hand, have a “resume” on file with MSOE for administrative purposes, probably for accreditation, and I do provide annual updates to them. But I haven’t created a beautiful document with a table of contents or anything like that. Who would see it? Why would I need a fancy CV when I’m not seeking new employment?

Well, now I know why, lol. I managed to assemble a decently respectable, ad hoc CV over the course of several hours yesterday afternoon and evening, just something acceptable that I could submit with my proposal, chagrin notwithstanding. And you never know. Now that I’ve needed it once (in 28 years), I might need it again someday, so I’m going to try spending a little time every week putting together something that I really like and that looks nice and professional. What I submitted last night wasn’t absolutely horrible, but if something is supposed to represent you and your work, ideally you would like to put your very best foot forward.

Anyhoo. I spent so much time researching and thinking about this article over the past two months that I wanted to share my abstract with you. I never know how good my ideas are, and part of me fears that this proposal is really dumb and obvious. Like, if an insight seems clear to me, then it must have been patently obvious to everyone else for a long time already and therefore isn’t a good idea. Sometimes I think I’m the absolute opposite of narcissistic. Surely there’s a happy medium between arrogance and diffidence, and that’s the sweet spot.

But anyhoo again. I did a lot of research to coax into being some kind of substantial grounding for my very vague, inchoate, intuitive feelings about the topic. Literally “substantial,” meaning the ideas were quite fleeting and insubstantial, and I needed actual facts and words to bring them into being. It was hard, but I like what I came up with, and if the Middle West Review doesn’t accept it, I’m going to write the article and find another home for it. This is the same kind of strongly positive feeling I had when I got my monthly book review column at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel years ago. I got the idea, telephoned the book review editor (which was extremely brave of me, but that’s how strong I thought my idea was), and then when I didn’t hear anything back for a month or two after I submitted a sample column, I sent a letter asking if they were still interested because if they weren’t I’d like to try elsewhere, which resulted in a phone call from them the next day and an invitation to lunch with a couple of editors. Followed by five years of writing the monthly columns, where I got to pick my own books, and feature articles whenever I thought of something interesting to write about. It was a great gig! I regretted giving it up, but I got a new position at work (program director of one of our degree programs) that made it impossible to give it the amount of time needed.

Anyhoo again (last time, I promise!). Here is my abstract. After that long buildup, I’m afraid now you’ll be expecting something much grander than what’s here. But still, I worked hard and want to share it with someone. Any thoughts, suggestions for reading, etc., are greatly appreciated! (Just don’t suggest revisions or point out typos, because it’s too late for me to do anything to fix it 🙂 )

The Geopolitics of Grain: How Cold War Agricultural Policy Shaped the Midwest

This article re-examines U.S. agricultural policy during the Cold War (1947-1991), particularly focusing on how the American Midwest became a pivotal player (the “breadbasket of the world”) in the ideological battle between capitalism and communism. By emphasizing the region as a strategic Cold War “battleground,” the article analyzes the extent to which Midwestern farmers and policymakers were both conscious and unconscious participants in global Cold War strategies. As American food surpluses came to represent the ideological contrast between capitalist abundance and communist scarcity (seen also in events like the 1959 Nixon-Khrushchev Kitchen Debate), agriculture became a powerful diplomatic tool, perhaps even a weapon. Initiatives like the Food for Peace program used food aid to expand U.S. influence in developing nations, countering Soviet efforts to spread communism and starkly contrasting with Mao’s disastrous Great Leap Forward in China, where collectivist policies led to famine and the deaths of millions.

The Cold War reshaped the Midwest not just economically but also socially and politically. Government subsidies and Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz’s “go big or get out” philosophy promoted the rise of large-scale corporate agribusiness, pushing small family farms to the brink and culminating in crises like the 1980s farm collapse. Local communities found their economies tied to volatile global markets and were devastated as schools, banks, and services disappeared, leaving ghost towns in their wake.

The consequences of Cold War-era agricultural policies are still unfolding. For example, agricultural practices with short-term geopolitical objectives, such as “fence row to fence row” planting, had long-term ecological costs. Ultimately, the Cold War both benefitted and burdened the American Midwest. As a local stage upon which global confrontations between powerful nations played out in hugely transformative ways, the region offers a unique case study of the Cold War’s enduring impact.

Posted in Food, History, Learning, Political Analysis, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Fresh!

Today is super busy and fairly stressful. I have a deadline tomorrow for an abstract of a proposed article that I’m going to try to upload in advance tonight to spare me the last-minute horrors of, say, the journal’s website crashing tomorrow beneath the weight of everyone else’s last-minute submissions or someone on campus needing something from me unexpectedly right during my final sprint when I need to concentrate on not making mistakes as I’m trying to beat the clock. On top of everything else this afternoon, I had to squeeze in a stop at the pharmacy and the grocery store on the way home. (Pesky “real life” distractions lol)

But I had a nice moment of joy there in the store today and thought I’d share. Nothing huge. Joy can arrive via such tiny, fleeting impressions sometimes that it’ll pass you right by if you’re not paying attention.

Today’s joy was one of those little “nothing” moments. I just really liked the saturated orange and green colors of the carrots and parsley together.

The produce shelves’ arrangement changes all the time, I assume so that shoppers don’t get too complacent and have to search harder for things that are no longer where they expect them to be. Maybe changing things up like that has been shown to increase sales?

Anyway, I think the placement of carrots and parsley together is new. And today the carrots were large and luscious, and the parsley bunches were vibrant and generously sized.

So, lucky me being there at exactly the right time!😀

Posted in Food, Life, Photography | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Is AI creative? | Vox

Essayist and author Meghan O’Gieblyn on the meaning of art in the age of artificial intelligence.
— Read on www.vox.com/the-gray-area/376192/tga-meghan-ogieblyn-creativity-art-ai

~~ This article frames a podcast conversation between Meghan O’Gieblyn and Sean Illing, Vox writer and host of “The Gray Area” podcast. Intriguing ideas, worthy of at least skimming the partial transcript, but a link to the actual podcast recording is also included if you’d like the full session.

Posted in Art, “Reblogged” posts from other writers, Creativity, Digital society, Learning, Technology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The Invention of Morel

Our MSOE (Milwaukee School of Engineering) Faculty and Staff Book Club met Monday night to discuss this short but fascinating novel. But first a “prologue,” complete with photo.

We meet at a place called The Explorium Brewpub, which is located in the historic Third Ward, the area of downtown Milwaukee running along the river south of the office district, in a renovated building that is part of a complex of beautiful old Italianate buildings that once housed the largest wholesale hardware company in “the region” (according to its Wikipedia article, HERE).

I guess that usually when I arrive, it must already be dark outside. Or maybe just overcast and/or raining. Or maybe I’m walking in with other people and focused on talking with them? Whatever the case, on Monday night the angle of the sun at around 5:30 PM cast a beautiful light on this sculpture I’d never noticed before. So, of course, I took a picture before heading inside!

Rusty, the Milwaukee Mastodon

Now for the book. I had never heard of it before. It’s by a South American author I had also never heard of, and it was recommended as a selection by a fellow professor who is from Argentina. A clue that I would probably like it, though (which I did!), was that the novel was dedicated to and the prologue written by the legendary Jorge Luis Borges (Wikipedia article HERE), whom I had not only heard of but had also read multiple works by. 

The Invention of Morel (Wikipedia article HERE), by Adolfo Bioy Casares, was published in 1940.

It’s a really short book, easy to read, yet difficult in terms of its strangely magical, even fantastical and at times slightly grotesque tale of a fugitive living alone on an island containing abandoned but somehow pristine accommodations (a museum/hotel, a chapel, and a swimming pool) that a mysterious group of tourists has come to visit for an extended stay. This nameless fugitive begins a diary on the day of their arrival, and the entire story is told from his point of view, by turns curious, enchanted, horrified, questioning, and ultimately resigned to and accepting of his unhappy fate, even as he is also hopeful that there is a heaven and that someone will understand how to employ the mysterious piece of technology that would make it possible for him to spend eternity in the company of the person he loves.

As I mentioned in my “dead leaves” post yesterday, this novel deals with themes of life versus death, image versus reality, and evanescent material presence versus indelible virtual immortality. Think about the way Facebook maintains profiles of those who have passed away and how those people maintain an eternal life somehow in their continued presence and the ability of others to interact with them via comments and uploaded photos. Or, if you have audio of a loved one’s voice, say in a voicemail message, how they are “alive” to you in some ways. When you hear their voice, when you smell their perfume, anything like that, you have the sensation of connection with them as a living person who is somehow present even in their absence.

In the novel, without giving too much away that you wouldn’t get from perusing the Amazon description, the main character falls in love with one of the tourists, Faustine, a woman who apparently was based on Louise Brooks, the silent movie actress, with whom the author was fascinated in real life. She is also, I believe, the woman shown in the novel’s cover photograph.

(Aside: I have long known of Louise Brooks but at the same time known absolutely nothing about her. As I was reading the novel, I went and looked up her article in Wikipedia, and now I’m fascinated, too. She wrote a memoir, in the form of collected essays, titled Lulu in Hollywood, published in 1982. So now I have a fun little project set up for myself going forward: to watch her movies and to read her memoir 🙂 )

Anyway, in a manner reminiscent of M. Night Shyamalan’s The Sixth Sense, our narrator spends time with Faustine every afternoon when she goes to sit near the ocean, looking out at the sea. She does not seem acknowledge his presence, but the narrator, at first quite skittish around all these tourists (understandably so as he is a fugitive from justice), develops a habit of approaching her when she appears each afternoon, tentatively at first but becoming increasingly comfortable with her, attracted to her beauty and serene silence. 

Then comes the day that another man, Morel, intrudes on their idyll by the sea. Our narrator is jealous, because it appears that Morel may have a relationship with Faustine. Then our narrator notices that when Morel and Faustine talk, their conversation seems to repeat itself. And then all the tourists vanish, except that they also then begin reappearing on the island at night. Other strange things begin to occur, as well. For one thing, there are suddenly two suns and two moons in the sky. And the tourists behave in manners at odds with the actual conditions; for example, they seem to be experiencing cold temperatures while the narrator feels the oppressive heat.

Much internal monologue commences as our narrator tries to puzzle out what is happening. Who are these people? Why are they here? Where did they go? How did they come back when their ship is gone? Why does no one acknowledge him, even when he is not hidden well? 

 Finally, Morel calls a big meeting for all the tourists, at which he reveals that he has invented a “machine” like a radio, except that instead of transmitting only audio waves or visual waves like a television, he can transmit the entire wave spectrum of a person. You don’t just hear and see the person (like a hologram, which wasn’t invented till 1948 but which I assume must have been an idea with some currency around the time the novel was published), but you can smell them and feel them, as well. Morel has spent the week “capturing” the tourists’ “images” to preserve them indefinitely. 

(Aside: I suppose the idea of capturing audio and video was still somewhat new, as the mediums of “talkies” and commercial radio would have been only 10-20 years old at the time the novel was written, and television was in its absolute infancy. The meaning and implications of images capable of capturing and preserving the immediacy of, say, a “living” moment in time or a person’s animated physical presence beyond what was possible in a still image like a photograph must have still been somewhat novel.)

But Morel apparently has not merely captured the tourists’ images. When he describes his earliest experiments with the equipment, things take an ugly turn. One of the tourists realizes he was at the place where and when these experiments happened (in Germany, I think he said? I don’t have the book with me at the moment to double check), and he angrily accuses Morel of murdering the men whose images were captured . . . and captured without their consent. Morel brushes this off. He does apologize, but not for killing people and stealing their souls in the process of preserving their images. Instead he regrets “this tedious incident” (the meeting? The week (during which their images have been preserved and their souls stolen?), and he tells everyone that thoughts of the pleasant week they’ve spent together will make the “important things” he has to tell them seem “less important.”

Finding out about “the invention” was, for me, the most intriguing part of the novel. In order to “capture” an image, Morel’s invention sucks up the entire “wavelength” of the subject’s “being” from the earthly plane and transforms it into a three-dimensional image (or maybe even a fourth- or fifth-dimensional image, considering all the sensory dimensions being “broadcast”) that will exist forever.

This transmogrification reminds me of an essay I wrote as an exercise for my writing group ten years ago and published as a blog post, “The truth about statues.” When I was very young, I thought that people in paintings or statues had somehow lost their lives in the process of being transformed into the artwork.

This also reminds me of the belief in some cultures that photographs steal the subject’s soul. Although usually characterized as the naive, childlike superstition of a primitive worldview, who knows? Maybe this belief is more worthy than our own sophisticated dismissal of the idea as magical nonsense.

Even beyond the ethical issues of soul stealing in modern media, what I find especially compelling as an academic who studies media and teaches both a film and media studies course and a course entitled “Digital Society” is the asymmetrical relationship established between an image and the material context(s) in which that image exists. How is the original altered by the ways in which its image is used? If an overlay of an entirely different image is superimposed upon that image, how is that image changed, and how does the new composited image alter one or both of the original subjects? 

Aside: The 4-episode John Berger series “Ways of Seeing” (BBC, 1972), based at least in part on the brilliant 1935 Walter Benjamin essay, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” gets at these questions beautifully. (Link to a PDF of this essay posted by MIT: https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/benjamin.pdf

Also, links to the four “Ways of Seeing” episodes below, FYI, in case you’re interested:

And back to our novel once again. As the narrator digests the startling revelation that all these tourists are actually projections playing out an endless recreation of a distinct series of events, he goes through a perhaps predictable sequence of emotional responses: confusion, anger, despair, resignation, curiosity.

Echoing the idea of and/or alluding to the title of Louise Brooks’ most famous film, Pandora’s Box (1929), the narrator is eventually drawn to the idea of finding Morel’s invention wherever it is hidden on the island. He hopes to figure out how it works and, most importantly, how to maintain his access to Faustine, the love of his life.

Of course, once he does find it, he also feels compelled to experiment with it. He “photographs” some plants and insects. Then he gets a little confused when he sees both the dead flies and flowers and the living ones side by side. What is real? What is not? More to the point, what is alive right now, in the world, and what is eternally preserved and both in the world and not in the world?

He gets brave (or stupid) enough to try photographing himself. But only his hand. And yes, soon an image of his hand appears among the plants and insects he had previously photographed, even as his own hand begins to deteriorate. To his horror, he realizes that his eternally waving hand (for that’s the way he filmed it, waving) has now taken up a place among the other images on exhibit on the walls of the museum.

The novel ends with our narrator wondering what will happen if he photographs his entire self. His image will live forever in the museum along with all the other images, but will his image ever encounter Faustine’s image? Does the actual machine of Morel’s invention still exist, or is the current camera/projector just an image? Because what if Morel somehow photographed the machine and what we see now is just an image, a replica that lacks the “soul” and authentic image-making capabilities of the original. The narrator implores whoever finds his diary: Please, please, if possible and the technology can be figured out, and also if there is indeed a heaven, please, please, find a way to upload both his and Faustine’s images to heaven, together, so that his soul can spend eternity with hers.

Just a really bizarre and unsettling tale is The Invention of Morel, but also definitely a page turner (for me, anyway) and most definitely an allegorical cornucopia of mind-bending questions and ideas that are still relevant today! I recommend it for anyone looking for something different to read.

Posted in Art, Books and reading, Creativity, Digital society, Life, Milwaukee, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments